• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质量改进的实用方法:新西兰皇家全科医生学院实践标准验证现场试验的经验

A practical approach to quality improvement: the experience of the RNZCGP practice standards validation field trial.

作者信息

Gillon Maureen, Buetow Stephen, Wellingham John, Talboys Sarah

机构信息

RNZCGP, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 2003 Nov 21;116(1186):U682.

PMID:14657965
Abstract

AIM

This paper describes the development, implementation and validation of general practice standards, supported by a continuous quality improvement (CQI) process that teaches practice teams how to work together to identify and enhance the quality of care they provide.

METHODS

Practice standards were developed through consensus by key stakeholders in general practice, pre-tested in four practices, and refined and piloted in 20 practices throughout New Zealand during 1999. A further field trial was undertaken to validate the standards and test the process of practice assessment. During 2000-2001, 74 practices volunteered to be assessed against the standards. Sixty one general practitioners, practice nurses and practice managers, nominated from independent practitioner associations (IPAs) or primary care organisations (PCOs), were trained to undertake the assessments.

RESULTS

On five of 13 variables, no statistically significant differences at the 0.05 level were identified between the practices in the field trial and a random sample of practices studied by Kljakovic. The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners (RNZCGP) standards were found to have excellent face validity and content validity, and good construct validity. Internal consistency was fair. Lessons from the evaluation have informed an improved version of the practice assessment tool.

CONCLUSIONS

The validation field trial provided the RNZCGP with a framework and tool for an accreditation process based on the principles of CQI. The tool offers patients and other stakeholders a credible measure of quality and safety at the practice level through a process bridging quality control and quality improvement.

摘要

目的

本文描述了全科医疗标准的制定、实施及验证过程,该过程由持续质量改进(CQI)流程提供支持,该流程指导医疗团队如何共同协作,以识别并提高他们所提供的医疗服务质量。

方法

全科医疗标准由全科医疗领域的关键利益相关者通过协商一致制定,在四个医疗机构进行了预测试,并于1999年在新西兰的20个医疗机构进行了完善和试点。又进行了一次现场试验,以验证这些标准并测试医疗评估过程。在2000 - 2001年期间,74个医疗机构自愿对照这些标准接受评估。从独立执业者协会(IPA)或初级保健组织(PCO)中提名的61名全科医生、执业护士和医疗机构管理人员接受了评估培训。

结果

在13个变量中的5个变量上,现场试验中的医疗机构与Kljakovic研究的随机抽取的医疗机构样本之间,在0.05水平上未发现统计学上的显著差异。发现新西兰皇家全科医生学院(RNZCGP)的标准具有出色的表面效度和内容效度,以及良好的结构效度。内部一致性尚可。评估所得经验为改进后的医疗评估工具提供了参考。

结论

验证性现场试验为RNZCGP提供了一个基于CQI原则的认证流程框架和工具。该工具通过一个连接质量控制和质量改进的过程,为患者及其他利益相关者提供了一种在医疗机构层面衡量质量和安全的可靠方法。

相似文献

1
A practical approach to quality improvement: the experience of the RNZCGP practice standards validation field trial.质量改进的实用方法:新西兰皇家全科医生学院实践标准验证现场试验的经验
N Z Med J. 2003 Nov 21;116(1186):U682.
2
National standards for general practice.全科医学国家标准。
Aust Fam Physician. 1998 Dec;27(12):1107-9.
3
Clinical indicators as measures of mental health nursing standards of practice in New Zealand.作为新西兰精神卫生护理实践标准衡量指标的临床指标。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2004 Jun;13(2):78-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-0979.2004.00322.x.
4
Measuring the quality of general practice in New Zealand.衡量新西兰全科医疗的质量。
N Z Med J. 2003 Nov 21;116(1186):U680.
5
Divisions, general practice and continuous quality improvement. What is the connection?部门划分、全科医疗与持续质量改进。它们之间有什么联系?
Aust Fam Physician. 2001 Jul;30(7):725-8.
6
Evaluation of a training program for device operators in the Australian Government's Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial: issues and implications for rural and remote practices.澳大利亚政府全科医疗即时检验试验中设备操作员培训项目的评估:农村及偏远医疗实践的问题与影响
Rural Remote Health. 2009 Jul-Sep;9(3):1189. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
7
Testing a European set of indicators for the evaluation of the management of primary care practices.测试一套用于评估初级保健机构管理的欧洲指标。
Fam Pract. 2006 Feb;23(1):137-47. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmi091. Epub 2005 Oct 21.
8
RCGP Quality Team Development programme: an illuminative evaluation.皇家全科医师学院质量团队发展计划:一项启发性评估。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13(5):356-62. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.5.356.
9
Development and validation of quality indicators for dementia diagnosis and management in a primary care setting.在基层医疗环境中开发和验证痴呆症诊断和管理的质量指标。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Mar;58(3):557-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02726.x. Epub 2010 Feb 22.
10
Assessment of management in general practice: validation of a practice visit method.全科医疗管理评估:一种诊疗访问方法的验证
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Nov;48(436):1743-50.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholder perspectives on implementing accreditation programs: a qualitative study of enabling factors.利益相关者对实施认证项目的看法:一项关于促进因素的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct 24;13:437. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-437.