Marks Gary
Melbourne Institute for Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne.
Br J Sociol. 2003 Dec;54(4):453-71. doi: 10.1080/0007131032000143555.
The paper addresses several debates surrounding the reproduction of socio-economic inequality: (i) the persistent inequality thesis, which maintains that despite the increases in educational participation socio-economic inequalities in education have not declined; (ii) the related thesis of maximally maintained inequality, which proposes that socio-economic inequalities decline only when participation levels for the most privileged socio-economic group approach saturation levels; (iii) the meritocracy debate on the importance of ability vis-à-vis socio-economic background and changes in its influence over time; and (iv) the effect of policy changes on socio-economic inequalities in education. These issues are addressed using data from six Australian youth cohorts born between 1961 and the mid-1980s.
(i)持续不平等论点,即尽管教育参与率有所提高,但教育中的社会经济不平等并未减少;(ii)最大程度维持不平等的相关论点,该论点认为只有当最具特权的社会经济群体的参与水平接近饱和水平时,社会经济不平等才会下降;(iii)关于能力相对于社会经济背景的重要性及其随时间影响变化的精英统治争论;以及(iv)政策变化对教育中社会经济不平等的影响。利用1961年至20世纪80年代中期出生的六个澳大利亚青年队列的数据来探讨这些问题。