Motamedi Mohammad Hosein Kalantar
Trauma Research Center Faculty, Baqiyatallah Medical Sciences, University, Tehran, Iran.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Dec;61(12):1390-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.07.001.
A 10-year retrospective study was undertaken of all patients treated for facial gunshot and shrapnel wounds at our medical center to evaluate the outcomes and assess the results of simultaneous management to treat the hard and soft tissue injuries primarily.
A total of 44 patients were treated. Medical documentation of the patients was compiled. All maxillofacial gunshot, shrapnel, and warfare injuries were treated by the oral and maxillofacial surgeon. Other concomitant bodily injuries were treated by pertinent consultant specialists. Patients ranged in age from 8 to 53 years, with a mean age of 24.7 years. Maxillofacial hard and soft tissue injuries were treated definitively in the first operation except when gross contamination, infection, extensive comminution, or general condition precluded this.
There were 2 shotgun, 28 bullet, 10 shrapnel, 3 land mine, and 1 breech block injuries. Overall postadmission mortality in this series was 2.2%. Of the 97.7% of the patients who had an injury to the underlying craniofacial skeleton, all required surgical intervention. The soft tissue and underlying bony injuries were addressed concomitantly (in a single stage at the time of primary surgical debridement) in 86.3% of the patients. Nine percent of the patients had a tracheostomy emergently for management of the airway, 6.8% had an intracranial injury, and 2.2% of them required neurosurgery. In the series, 4.5% of the patients had neck wounds that required exploration. Comprehensive treatment was rendered in 1 to 3 major operations (average, 1.5).
All patients in this series required surgical intervention for treatment of their facial gunshot wounds. Primary treatment of hard and soft tissue injuries of the face at the time of surgical debridement was possible in the majority of our patients. This minimized the number of admissions and did not bear a higher complication rate than other reported series that advocate multiple staged operations to treat such injuries despite the fact that, in our series, flaps were also mobilized for wound closure in the primary phase.
对在我们医疗中心接受面部枪伤和弹片伤治疗的所有患者进行了一项为期10年的回顾性研究,以评估治疗结果,并评估同时处理硬组织和软组织损伤的主要治疗效果。
共治疗44例患者。收集了患者的医疗记录。所有颌面枪伤、弹片伤和战伤均由口腔颌面外科医生治疗。其他伴随的身体损伤由相关的专科顾问医生治疗。患者年龄在8至53岁之间,平均年龄为24.7岁。除了严重污染、感染、广泛粉碎或一般情况不允许外,颌面硬组织和软组织损伤在首次手术中得到了确定性治疗。
有2例猎枪伤、28例子弹伤、10例弹片伤、3例地雷伤和1例枪闩伤。该系列患者入院后的总体死亡率为2.2%。在97.7%有颅面骨骼损伤的患者中,所有人都需要手术干预。86.3%的患者在初次手术清创时同时处理了软组织和深部骨组织损伤(在同一阶段)。9%的患者因气道管理紧急行气管切开术,6.8%有颅内损伤,其中2.2%需要神经外科治疗。在该系列中,4.5%的患者颈部伤口需要探查。在1至3次大手术(平均1.5次)中进行了综合治疗。
该系列中的所有患者都需要手术干预来治疗面部枪伤。在大多数患者中,手术清创时对面部硬组织和软组织损伤进行一期治疗是可行的。这减少了住院次数,且与其他主张采用多阶段手术治疗此类损伤的报道系列相比,并发症发生率并不更高,尽管在我们的系列中,在一期也动员皮瓣进行伤口闭合。