Ward Marsha D W, Sailstad Denise M, Andrews Debora L, Boykin Elizabeth H, Selgrade MaryJane K
Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail Drop B143-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2004 Jan 9;67(1):73-85. doi: 10.1080/15287390490253679.
The immunosuppressive effects of exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) are well known and the underlying mechanisms extensively studied. The suppression of Th1 appears to account for UVR suppression of contact hypersensitivity and delayed-type hypersensitivity responses and increased susceptibility to certain infections and tumor development. The underlying mechanisms suggest Th2-mediated responses associated with immediate-type hypersensitivity and allergic lung disease should be unchanged or possibly enhanced by UVR. The hypothesis that UVR exposure enhances allergic lung disease in BALB/c mice was tested. Effects of UVR on sensitization and elicitation of respiratory hypersensitivity were assessed using a fungal extract, Metarhizium anisopliae (MACA), as the allergen. BALB/c mice were sham or UVR (8 KJ/m(2)) exposed 3d before involuntary aspiration (IA) of MACA or vehicle. The mice received UVR exposures before the first and second of three IAs in the sensitization protocol and 3 d before the fourth IA in the elicitation protocol. Serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were harvested before (d 21, sensitization/d 24, elicitation) and at 1 (d 22/d 28), 3 (d 24/d 29), and 7 (d 28/d 35) d following the last IA. UVR exposure prior to sensitization suppressed two hallmarks of allergic disease, immune-mediated inflammation (eosinophil influx) and total immunoglobulin (Ig)E compared to the sham-UVR controls. There were no differences attributable to UVR exposure in previously sensitized mice. These data suggest that UVR exposure prior to sensitization suppresses allergic responses but has no effect on the elicitation of allergic responses in previously sensitized individuals. Consequently, there is no evidence that exposure to UVR enhances the induction or expression of allergic lung disease.
暴露于紫外线辐射(UVR)的免疫抑制作用是众所周知的,其潜在机制也得到了广泛研究。Th1的抑制似乎是UVR抑制接触性超敏反应和迟发型超敏反应以及增加对某些感染和肿瘤发生易感性的原因。潜在机制表明,与速发型超敏反应和过敏性肺病相关的Th2介导的反应应该不会因UVR而改变,甚至可能增强。本研究对UVR暴露会加重BALB/c小鼠过敏性肺病这一假说进行了验证。以真菌提取物绿僵菌(MACA)作为变应原,评估UVR对呼吸道超敏反应致敏和激发的影响。在对MACA或赋形剂进行非自愿吸入(IA)前3天,对BALB/c小鼠进行假照射或UVR(8 kJ/m²)照射。在致敏方案的三次IA中的第一次和第二次之前以及激发方案的第四次IA之前3天,小鼠接受UVR照射。在最后一次IA之前(致敏第21天/激发第24天)以及最后一次IA之后1天(第22天/第28天)、3天(第24天/第29天)和7天(第28天/第35天)采集血清和支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)。与假照射对照组相比,致敏前的UVR照射抑制了过敏性疾病两个特征,即免疫介导的炎症(嗜酸性粒细胞流入)和总免疫球蛋白(Ig)E。在先前致敏的小鼠中,未观察到UVR照射带来的差异。这些数据表明,致敏前的UVR照射可抑制过敏反应,但对先前致敏个体的过敏反应激发没有影响。因此,没有证据表明暴露于UVR会增强过敏性肺病的诱导或表达。