Thompson Christine M, Richards Donald S, Fancy Sally-Ann, Perkins George L, Pullen Frank S, Thom Catriona
Pfizer Global Research and Development, Ramsgate Road, Sandwich CT13 9NJ, UK.
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2003;17(24):2804-8. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1270.
Mass spectrometry plays a major role in the structural elucidation and characterisation of drug candidates and related substances. Accurate mass data allow the mathematical prediction of molecular formula of both precursor and fragment ions. In this paper, a comparison of the accurate mass data obtained for the fragmentation of fluconazole, an antifungal drug, by three different methods is made: electron ionisation (EI) using a magnetic sector instrument; electrospray ionisation (ES) using a Fourier transform ion cyclotron mass spectrometer (FTICRMS); and ES using a quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Q-ToF). It is clear from the data obtained that mass accuracy is not simply a function of instrument resolution. The subtle differences observed between collisionally activated dissociation (CAD) and sustained off-resonance collisionally activated dissociation (SORI-CAD) spectra are explained as a consequence of the excitation process. The advantages and disadvantages of the three techniques are discussed within the context of structural elucidation.
质谱分析法在药物候选物及相关物质的结构解析和表征中起着重要作用。精确质量数据可对前体离子和碎片离子的分子式进行数学预测。本文对三种不同方法用于抗真菌药物氟康唑裂解所获得的精确质量数据进行了比较:使用磁扇形仪器的电子电离(EI);使用傅里叶变换离子回旋共振质谱仪(FTICRMS)的电喷雾电离(ES);以及使用四极杆飞行时间质谱仪(Q-ToF)的ES。从所获得的数据可以清楚地看出,质量精度不仅仅是仪器分辨率的函数。碰撞激活解离(CAD)和持续非共振碰撞激活解离(SORI-CAD)光谱之间观察到的细微差异被解释为激发过程的结果。在结构解析的背景下讨论了这三种技术的优缺点。