Schmidlin Patrick Roger, Göhring Till Nicolaus, Schug Jens, Lutz Felix
Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, Dental Institute, Zurich University, Plattenstrasse 11, 8028 Zurich, Switzerland.
Am J Dent. 2003 Sep;16 Spec No:4A-8A.
To determine the loss of enamel after a single 20-secondsapplication of a microabrasion slurry and to evaluate structural changes by means of laser fluorescence, and microscopic and optical measurements.
Defined buccal areas with a diameter of 2 mm from 16 extracted human molars were demineralized for 12 weeks using a demineralization gel (pH 4.8). The created artificial white-spot lesions were divided corono-apically in control and test sites, using a rubber cement that prospectively covered the untreated control site. Teeth were divided into two groups of eight teeth each. One group was treated with an abrasive cleaning paste (Pell-ex) and the other group with a commercially available microabrasion slurry (Opalustre) for 20 seconds, applying a load of 200 g. Before and after treatment, standardized photographs were taken for the determination of luminescence and profilometric tracings of the surface, and these were recorded for the determination of enamel loss. The grade of demineralization was quantified using a laser fluorescence method (Diagnodent). Statistical differences were checked using a Mann Whitney and student t-test. Replicas of the treated areas were made for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, and teeth were histologically investigated by polarized light microscopy.
Loss of tooth substance was significantly higher (P < or = 0.001) for the microabrasion group (134.8 +/- 35.5 microm) compared with the abrasive cleaning paste group (4.5 +/- 1.2 microm). After treatment, statistically significant differences in fluorescence and luminescence measurements could only be detected for microabraded teeth. No significant changes were noted for teeth treated with an abrasive cleaning paste. Histological findings confirmed removal of the demineralized surface zone when microabrading the enamel, whereas no changes were observed in the test group treated with an abrasive cleaning paste. Polarized light microscopy did not indicate any changes in the mineralization pattern, for example compaction, in the treated subsurface zone.
确定单次应用微磨除糊剂20秒后牙釉质的损失情况,并通过激光荧光、显微镜和光学测量来评估结构变化。
从16颗拔除的人类磨牙上确定直径为2毫米的颊侧区域,使用脱矿凝胶(pH 4.8)进行12周的脱矿处理。使用橡胶粘合剂将形成的人工白斑病变在冠根方向分为对照部位和试验部位,该粘合剂预先覆盖未处理的对照部位。牙齿分为两组,每组八颗。一组用研磨清洁膏(Pell-ex)处理,另一组用市售微磨除糊剂(Opalustre)处理20秒,施加200克的负荷。处理前后,拍摄标准化照片以确定表面的发光和轮廓测量追踪情况,并记录这些数据以确定牙釉质损失。使用激光荧光法(Diagnodent)对脱矿程度进行量化。使用曼-惠特尼检验和学生t检验检查统计学差异。制作处理区域的复制品用于扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析,并通过偏光显微镜对牙齿进行组织学研究。
与研磨清洁膏组(4.5±1.2微米)相比,微磨除组(134.8±35.5微米)的牙体组织损失明显更高(P≤0.001)。处理后,仅在微磨除的牙齿中检测到荧光和发光测量的统计学显著差异。用研磨清洁膏处理的牙齿未观察到显著变化。组织学结果证实,微磨除牙釉质时脱矿表面区域被去除,而用研磨清洁膏处理的试验组未观察到变化。偏光显微镜未显示处理后的亚表面区域矿化模式有任何变化,例如压实情况。