Nikaido Toru, Cho Eitetsu, Nakajima Masatoshi, Tashiro Hiroshi, Toba Shigemitsu, Burrow Michael F, Tagami Junji
Department of Restorative Sciences, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113 - 8549, Japan.
Am J Dent. 2003 Sep;16 Spec No:41A-46A.
To evaluate the effect of a resin coating technique on dentin tensile bond strengths of dual-cured resin cements.
10 bovine dentin specimens were tested for tensile bond strengths of each of the following four materials: Panavia F, Link Max, Bistite II, Rely-X. Bovine dentin ground with 600-grit SiC was bonded with a resin cement according to the manufacturers' instructions or the resin coating technique, which was used in combination with one coat of a dentin adhesive; Clearfil SE Bond, Unifil Bond, One-Up Bond F or Single Bond, with one coat of a low viscosity micro-filled resin, Protect Liner-F. Each dentin adhesive and the low viscosity micro-filled resin were cured for 10 seconds and 20 seconds respectively. After 1 day storage in water, the specimens were subjected to the tensile bond test at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/minute. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Fisher's PLSD test (P < 0.05). The mode of failure after the tensile bond test was classified by visual inspection. The resin cement - dentin interfaces were examined by SEM.
The tensile bond strengths (MPa +/- SD) of four resin cements to dentin with/without resin coating were: Panavia F (22.9 +/- 3.1; 10.2 +/- 2.5), Link Max (16.1 +/- 4.4; 9.6 +/- 3.2), Bistite II (14.8 +/- 3.2; 14.3 +/- 3.9), and Rely-X (15.7 +/- 4.7; 13.5 +/- 4.5), respectively. The resin coating significantly improved the bond strengths of resin cements to dentin in Panavia F and Link Max, while there were no significant differences of mean bond strengths between Bistite II or Rely-X with and without resin coating (P> 0.05). Regarding the fracture modes, complete and partial adhesive failures were observed in the cases without resin coating. For the resin coating groups, the fracture modes were much more complicated, although, adhesive failures rarely occurred. Hybrid layer formation was observed for all materials used.
评估树脂涂层技术对双固化树脂水门汀与牙本质拉伸粘结强度的影响。
对10个牛牙本质标本测试以下四种材料各自的拉伸粘结强度:Panavia F、Link Max、Bistite II、Rely-X。用600目碳化硅砂纸打磨的牛牙本质按照制造商说明或树脂涂层技术,与树脂水门汀粘结,树脂涂层技术与一层牙本质粘结剂联合使用;Clearfil SE Bond、Unifil Bond、One-Up Bond F或Single Bond,再涂一层低粘度微填料树脂Protect Liner-F。每种牙本质粘结剂和低粘度微填料树脂分别固化10秒和20秒。在水中储存1天后,以2毫米/分钟的十字头速度对标本进行拉伸粘结测试。数据采用双向方差分析和Fisher最小显著差异检验(P<0.05)。拉伸粘结测试后的断裂模式通过目视检查分类。用扫描电子显微镜检查树脂水门汀与牙本质的界面。
四种树脂水门汀在有/无树脂涂层情况下与牙本质的拉伸粘结强度(MPa±标准差)分别为:Panavia F(22.9±3.1;10.2±2.5)、Link Max(16.1±4.4;9.6±3.2)、Bistite II(14.8±3.2;14.3±3.9)和Rely-X(15.7±4.7;13.5±4.5)。树脂涂层显著提高了Panavia F和Link Max中树脂水门汀与牙本质的粘结强度,而Bistite II或Rely-X有/无树脂涂层时平均粘结强度无显著差异(P>0.05)。关于断裂模式,在无树脂涂层的情况下观察到完全和部分粘结失败。对于树脂涂层组,断裂模式更为复杂,尽管粘结失败很少发生。对所有使用的材料均观察到混合层形成。