• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

回顾得梅因河中的硝酸盐浓度:1945年以及1976 - 2001年

Revisiting nitrate concentrations in the Des Moines River: 1945 and 1976-2001.

作者信息

McIsaac G F, Libra R D

机构信息

Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, W-503 Turner Hall, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2003 Nov-Dec;32(6):2280-9. doi: 10.2134/jeq2003.2280.

DOI:10.2134/jeq2003.2280
PMID:14674552
Abstract

Recent compilations of historical and contemporary riverine nitrate (NO3) concentrations indicate that concentrations in many rivers in the north-central USA increased during the second half of the 20th century. The Des Moines River near Des Moines, Iowa, however, was reported to have had similar NO3 concentrations in 1945 and the 1980s, in spite of substantially greater N input to the watershed during the latter period. The objective of this study was to reconsider the comparison of historical and contemporary NO3 concentrations in the Des Moines River near Des Moines in light of the following: (i) possible errors in the historical data used, (ii) variations in methods of sample collection, (iii) variations in location of sampling, and (iv) additional data collected since 1990. We discovered that an earlier study had compared the flow-weighted average concentration in 1945 to arithmetic annual average concentrations in the 1980s. The intertemporal comparison also appeared to be influenced by differences in sample collection methods and locations used at different times. Depending on the model used and the estimated effects of composite sample collection, the 1945 arithmetic average NO3 concentration was between 44 and 57% of the expected mean value at a similar water yield during 1976-2001. The flow-weighted average NO3 concentration for 1945 was between 54 and 73% of the expected mean value at a similar water yield during 1976-2001. The difference between NO3 concentrations in 1945 and the contemporary period are larger than previously reported for the Des Moines River.

摘要

近期对历史和当代河流硝酸盐(NO₃)浓度的汇编表明,美国中北部许多河流的浓度在20世纪后半叶有所增加。然而,据报道,爱荷华州得梅因附近的得梅因河在1945年和20世纪80年代的NO₃浓度相似,尽管后期流域的氮输入大幅增加。本研究的目的是根据以下因素重新考虑得梅因附近得梅因河历史和当代NO₃浓度的比较:(i)所用历史数据可能存在的误差,(ii)样本采集方法的变化,(iii)采样地点的变化,以及(iv)1990年以来收集的额外数据。我们发现,早期一项研究将1945年的流量加权平均浓度与20世纪80年代的算术年均浓度进行了比较。跨期比较似乎也受到不同时期样本采集方法和地点差异的影响。根据所使用的模型以及复合样本采集的估计影响,1945年的算术平均NO₃浓度在1976 - 2001年类似产水量时预期平均值的44%至57%之间。1945年的流量加权平均NO₃浓度在1976 - 2001年类似产水量时预期平均值的54%至73%之间。1945年与当代时期的NO₃浓度差异比之前报道的得梅因河的差异更大。

相似文献

1
Revisiting nitrate concentrations in the Des Moines River: 1945 and 1976-2001.回顾得梅因河中的硝酸盐浓度:1945年以及1976 - 2001年
J Environ Qual. 2003 Nov-Dec;32(6):2280-9. doi: 10.2134/jeq2003.2280.
2
Modeling nitrate-nitrogen load reduction strategies for the Des Moines River, Iowa using SWAT.使用SWAT模型对爱荷华州得梅因河的硝酸盐氮负荷削减策略进行建模。
Environ Manage. 2009 Oct;44(4):671-82. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9364-y. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
3
Evaluation of nitrate nitrogen fluxes from a tile-drained watershed in central Iowa.爱荷华州中部一个有瓦管排水的流域硝酸盐氮通量评估。
J Environ Qual. 2003 Mar-Apr;32(2):642-53. doi: 10.2134/jeq2003.6420.
4
Evaluation of variation in nitrate concentration levels in the Raccoon River watershed in Iowa.爱荷华州浣熊河流域硝酸盐浓度水平变化评估。
J Environ Qual. 2012 Sep-Oct;41(5):1557-65. doi: 10.2134/jeq2011.0301.
5
Iowa Stream Nitrate, Discharge and Precipitation: 30-Year Perspective.爱荷华州河流硝酸盐、流量与降水:30 年透视。
Environ Manage. 2018 Oct;62(4):709-720. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1074-x. Epub 2018 May 31.
6
Using the late spring nitrate test to reduce nitrate loss within a watershed.利用晚春硝酸盐测试减少流域内的硝酸盐流失。
J Environ Qual. 2004 Mar-Apr;33(2):669-77.
7
Nitrate in the Mississippi River and its tributaries, 1980 to 2008: are we making progress?密西西比河流域及其支流的硝酸盐含量,1980 年至 2008 年:我们是否取得了进展?
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Sep 1;45(17):7209-16. doi: 10.1021/es201221s. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
8
Persistence of dieldrin water and channel catfish from the Des Moines River, Iowa, 1971-73 and 1978.
Pestic Monit J. 1981 Sep;15(2):98-102.
9
Monitoring nitrate leaching from submerged drains.监测来自暗管排水的硝酸盐淋失情况。
J Environ Qual. 2001 May-Jun;30(3):1092-6. doi: 10.2134/jeq2001.3031092x.
10
Rye cover crop and gamagrass strip effects on NO3 concentration and load in tile drainage.黑麦覆盖作物和类蜀黍条带对瓦管排水中硝酸盐浓度和负荷的影响。
J Environ Qual. 2007 Aug 31;36(5):1503-11. doi: 10.2134/jeq2006.0468. Print 2007 Sep-Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Iowa Stream Nitrate, Discharge and Precipitation: 30-Year Perspective.爱荷华州河流硝酸盐、流量与降水:30 年透视。
Environ Manage. 2018 Oct;62(4):709-720. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1074-x. Epub 2018 May 31.
2
Iowa stream nitrate and the Gulf of Mexico.爱荷华州河流中的硝酸盐与墨西哥湾。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0195930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195930. eCollection 2018.