Shah Alia, Connolly Cara M, Kirschner Robert A, Herndon David N, Kramer George C
Resuscitation Research Laboratory, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555, USA.
Shock. 2004 Jan;21(1):86-92. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000101666.49265.b4.
It has been suggested that hyperdynamic (HD) resuscitation improves outcomes. We hypothesized that initial HD resuscitation of burn injury using fluid and inotropes would improve metabolic function as indicated by base excess. We used an anesthetized ovine model of 60% TBSA full-thickness flame burn with delayed resuscitation started at 90 min after burn and continued for 8 h. Three groups (n = 6 each) were included: 1) HD defined as cardiac index (CI) of 1.5x baseline achieved by using Ringer's lactate alone (HD-Fluid); 2) Ringer's lactate and dobutamine (HD-Drug); and 3) Parkland Formula (Parkland) as a control group. Statistical analysis performed using analysis of variance and Tukey's HSD test. Significance accepted at P < 0.05. Higher CI was achieved in both HD-Fluid and HD-Drug groups, e.g., at 8 h the CI was 4.6 +/- 0.4 and 4.7 +/- 0.6 L/min/m respectively, as compared with Parkland 3.6 +/- 0.5 L/min/m. The net fluid balance (fluid infused - urine output) was similar in both Parkland and HD-Drug groups, which were 2.5x more in HD-Fluid (P = 0.001). The mean postburn urinary outputs were similar in both Parkland and HD-Drug groups, e.g., Parkland (0.9 +/- 0.08 mL/kg/h), HD-Drug (1.0 +/- 0.2 mL/kg/h) and increased in HD-Fluid (3.7 +/- 1.0 mL/kg/h; P = 0.0005). Base excess remained positive in both HD-Drug (+2.5 +/- 1 mmol/L) and Parkland (+1.5 +/- 1.7 mmol/L), and declined to -4.0 +/- 3.6 mmol/L in HD-Fluid group (P = 0.036). We conclude that there may be no benefit to using hyperdynamic regimens for the initial resuscitation of burn injury.
有人提出高动力(HD)复苏可改善预后。我们假设,使用液体和血管活性药物对烧伤进行初始HD复苏,将改善以碱剩余表示的代谢功能。我们使用了一种麻醉的绵羊模型,该模型为60%体表面积的全层火焰烧伤,延迟复苏在烧伤后90分钟开始,持续8小时。包括三组(每组n = 6):1)HD定义为仅使用乳酸林格液使心脏指数(CI)达到基线的1.5倍(HD-液体组);2)乳酸林格液和多巴酚丁胺(HD-药物组);3)帕克land公式(帕克land组)作为对照组。使用方差分析和图基HSD检验进行统计分析。P < 0.05时认为具有显著性。HD-液体组和HD-药物组均实现了更高的CI,例如,在8小时时,CI分别为4.6±0.4和4.7±0.6 L/min/m²,而帕克land组为3.6±0.5 L/min/m²。帕克land组和HD-药物组的净液体平衡(输入液体量-尿量)相似,HD-液体组则多2.5倍(P = 0.001)。帕克land组和HD-药物组的烧伤后平均尿量相似,例如,帕克land组(0.9±0.08 mL/kg/h)、HD-药物组(1.0±0.2 mL/kg/h),HD-液体组增加(3.7±1.0 mL/kg/h;P = 0.0005)。HD-药物组(+2.5±1 mmol/L)和帕克land组(+1.5±1.7 mmol/L)的碱剩余均保持为正值,而HD-液体组降至-4.0±3.6 mmol/L(P = 0.036)。我们得出结论,对于烧伤的初始复苏,使用高动力方案可能没有益处。