Galil N I, Sheindorf Ch, Stahl N, Tenenbaum A, Levinsky Y
Department of Civil Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.
Water Sci Technol. 2003;48(8):103-10.
The full-scale existing treatment plant in a paper mill in Hedera, Israel, includes equalization, solids separation by either straining or by dissolved air flotation and biological treatment by activated sludge. The operation of the existing biological process is often characterized by disturbances, mainly bad settling, voluminous bioflocs, followed by wash-out of the biosolids. This paper summarizes the results obtained in a study based on a pilot plant including a membrane biological reactor (MBR) compared to the "conventional" activated sludge process in the aerobic treatment of the effluent obtained from an anaerobic reactor. During the pilot operation period (about 90 days after achieving steady state) the MBR system provided steady operation performance, while the activated sludge produced effluent characterized by oscillatory values. The results are based on average values and indicate much lower levels of suspended solids in the MBR effluent, 2.5 mg/L, as compared to 37 mg/L in the activated sludge. As a result, the total organic mater content was also substantially lower in the MBR effluent, 129 vs 204 mg/L as COD, and 7.1 vs 83 mg/L as BOD. The MBR enabled better nitrification. The ability to develop and maintain a concentration of over 11,000 mg/L of mixed liquor volatile suspended solids in the MBR bioreactor enabled an intensive bioprocess at relatively high cell residence time. As a result the biosolids which had to be removed as excess sludge were characterized by relatively low volatile/total suspended solids ratio, around 0.78. This could facilitate and lower the cost of biosolids treatment and handling. The results of this comparative study indicate that in the case of MBR there will be no need for further treatment, while after activated sludge additional filtration will be required. The study leads to the conclusion that MBR will be the best technology for aerobic treatment of the anaerobic effluent of the paper mill.
以色列赫德拉一家造纸厂的全规模现有污水处理厂,包括均衡调节、通过过滤或溶解气浮进行固体分离以及活性污泥法生物处理。现有生物处理工艺的运行常常受到干扰,主要表现为沉降不佳、生物絮体体积庞大,随后生物固体被冲出。本文总结了一项基于中试装置的研究结果,该中试装置包括一个膜生物反应器(MBR),并将其与“传统”活性污泥法用于厌氧反应器流出物的好氧处理进行了比较。在中试运行期间(达到稳态后约90天),MBR系统提供了稳定的运行性能,而活性污泥法产生的流出物数值波动较大。结果基于平均值,表明MBR流出物中的悬浮固体水平要低得多,为2.5毫克/升,而活性污泥法为37毫克/升。因此,MBR流出物中的总有机物质含量也显著更低,化学需氧量(COD)分别为129毫克/升和204毫克/升,生化需氧量(BOD)分别为7.1毫克/升和83毫克/升。MBR实现了更好的硝化作用。在MBR生物反应器中能够培养并维持超过11,000毫克/升的混合液挥发性悬浮固体浓度,使得在相对较高的细胞停留时间下能够进行强化生物处理。结果,作为剩余污泥必须去除的生物固体的挥发性/总悬浮固体比率相对较低,约为0.78。这可以简化并降低生物固体处理和处置的成本。这项对比研究的结果表明,对于MBR而言无需进一步处理,而活性污泥法之后则需要额外的过滤。该研究得出结论,MBR将是造纸厂厌氧流出物好氧处理的最佳技术。