Tenenbaum L, Lehtonen E, Monahan P E
Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie Humaine et Moléculaire, ULB, Belgium.
Curr Gene Ther. 2003 Dec;3(6):545-65. doi: 10.2174/1566523034578131.
Recombinant AAV efficacy has been demonstrated in numerous gene therapy preclinical studies. As this vector is increasingly applied to human clinical trials, it is a priority to evaluate the risks of its use for workers involved in research and clinical trials as well as for the patients and their descendants. At high multiplicity of infection, wild-type AAV integrates into human chromosome 19 in approximately 60% of latently infected cell lines. However, it has been recently demonstrated that only approximately 1 out of 1000 infectious units can integrate. The mechanism of this site-specific integration involves AAV Rep proteins which are absent in vectors. Accordingly, recombinant AAV (rAAV) do not integrate site-specifically. Random integration of vector sequences has been demonstrated in established cell lines but only in some cases and at low frequency in primary cultures and in vivo. In contrast, episomal concatemers predominate.Therefore, the risks of insertional mutagenesis and activation of oncogenes are considered low. Biodistribution studies in non-human primates after intramuscular, intrabronchial, hepatic artery and subretinal administration showed low and transient levels of vector DNA in body fluids and distal organs. Analysis of patients body fluids revealed rAAV sequences in urine, saliva and serum at short-term. Transient shedding into the semen has been observed after delivery to the hepatic artery. However, motile germ cells seemed refractory to rAAV infection even when directly exposed to the viral particles, suggesting that the risk of insertion of new genetic material into the germ line is absent or extremely low. Risks related to viral capsid-induced inflammation also seem to be absent since immune response is restricted to generation of antibodies. In contrast, transgene products can elicit both cellular and humoral immune responses, depending on the nature of the expressed protein and of the route of vector administration. Finally, a correlation between early abortion as well as male infertility and the presence of wt AAV DNA in the genital tract has been suggested. Although no causal relationship has been established, this issue stresses the importance of using rAAV stocks devoid of contaminating replication-competent AAV. This review comprehensively examines virus integration, biodistribution, immune interactions, and other safety concerns regarding the wild-type AAV and recombinant AAV vectors.
重组腺相关病毒(AAV)的疗效已在众多基因治疗临床前研究中得到证实。随着这种载体越来越多地应用于人体临床试验,优先评估其对参与研究和临床试验的工作人员以及患者及其后代使用的风险至关重要。在高感染复数时,野生型AAV在大约60%的潜伏感染细胞系中整合到人类19号染色体上。然而,最近已证明,每1000个感染单位中只有约1个能够整合。这种位点特异性整合的机制涉及载体中不存在的AAV Rep蛋白。因此,重组AAV(rAAV)不会进行位点特异性整合。载体序列的随机整合已在已建立的细胞系中得到证实,但仅在某些情况下发生,并且在原代培养物和体内的频率较低。相比之下,游离串联体占主导。因此,插入诱变和致癌基因激活的风险被认为较低。在肌肉内、支气管内、肝动脉和视网膜下给药后,对非人类灵长类动物进行的生物分布研究表明,体液和远端器官中的载体DNA水平较低且短暂。对患者体液的分析显示,短期内尿液、唾液和血清中存在rAAV序列。在肝动脉给药后,已观察到精液中有短暂的病毒排出。然而,即使直接暴露于病毒颗粒,活动的生殖细胞似乎对rAAV感染具有抗性,这表明将新的遗传物质插入生殖系的风险不存在或极低。由于免疫反应仅限于抗体的产生,与病毒衣壳诱导的炎症相关的风险似乎也不存在。相比之下,转基因产物可根据表达蛋白的性质和载体给药途径引发细胞免疫和体液免疫反应。最后,有人提出早期流产以及男性不育与生殖道中野生型AAV DNA的存在之间存在关联。尽管尚未建立因果关系,但这个问题强调了使用不含具有复制能力的污染性AAV的rAAV储备的重要性。这篇综述全面研究了野生型AAV和重组AAV载体的病毒整合、生物分布、免疫相互作用以及其他安全问题。