Bolnick Daniel I, Doebeli Michael
Section of Evolution and Ecology, Center for Population Biology, Storer Hall, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA.
Evolution. 2003 Nov;57(11):2433-49. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01489.x.
Models of adaptive speciation are typically concerned with demonstrating that it is possible for ecologically driven disruptive selection to lead to the evolution of assortative mating and hence speciation. However, disruptive selection could also lead to other forms of evolutionary diversification, including ecological sexual dimorphisms. Using a model of frequency-dependent intraspecific competition, we show analytically that adaptive speciation and dimorphism require identical ecological conditions. Numerical simulations of individual-based models show that a single ecological model can produce either evolutionary outcome, depending on the genetic independence of male and female traits and the potential strength of assortative mating. Speciation is inhibited when the genetic basis of male and female ecological traits allows the sexes to diverge substantially. This is because sexual dimorphism, which can evolve quickly, can eliminate the frequency-dependent disruptive selection that would have provided the impetus for speciation. Conversely, populations with strong assortative mating based on ecological traits are less likely to evolve a sexual dimorphism because females cannot simultaneously prefer males more similar to themselves while still allowing the males to diverge. This conflict between speciation and dimorphism can be circumvented in two ways. First, we find a novel form of speciation via negative assortative mating, leading to two dimorphic daughter species. Second, if assortative mating is based on a neutral marker trait, trophic dimorphism and speciation by positive assortative mating can occur simultaneously. We conclude that while adaptive speciation and ecological sexual dimorphism may occur simultaneously, allowing for sexual dimorphism restricts the likelihood of adaptive speciation. Thus, it is important to recognize that disruptive selection due to frequency-dependent interactions can lead to more than one form of adaptive splitting.
适应性物种形成模型通常关注于证明生态驱动的分裂选择有可能导致选型交配的进化,进而导致物种形成。然而,分裂选择也可能导致其他形式的进化多样化,包括生态性二态性。通过一个频率依赖的种内竞争模型,我们通过分析表明适应性物种形成和二态性需要相同的生态条件。基于个体模型的数值模拟表明,单一的生态模型可以产生任何一种进化结果,这取决于雄性和雌性性状的遗传独立性以及选型交配的潜在强度。当雄性和雌性生态性状的遗传基础使两性能够大幅分化时,物种形成就会受到抑制。这是因为能够快速进化的性二态性可以消除原本会为物种形成提供动力的频率依赖分裂选择。相反,基于生态性状进行强选型交配的种群不太可能进化出性二态性,因为雌性不能在偏好与自己更相似的雄性的同时,还允许雄性发生分化。物种形成和二态性之间的这种冲突可以通过两种方式规避。首先,我们发现了一种通过负选型交配形成物种的新形式,从而产生两个二态性的子代物种。其次,如果选型交配基于一个中性标记性状,营养二态性和通过正选型交配形成物种可以同时发生。我们得出结论,虽然适应性物种形成和生态性二态性可能同时发生,但允许性二态性会限制适应性物种形成的可能性。因此,重要的是要认识到,由于频率依赖相互作用导致的分裂选择可能会导致不止一种形式的适应性分化。