Suppr超能文献

创伤后头痛:持久性及其与法律和解的关系

Posttraumatic headache: permanency and relationship to legal settlement.

作者信息

Packard R C

机构信息

Neurology and Headache Management, Pensacola, Florida 32503.

出版信息

Headache. 1992 Nov;32(10):496-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1992.hed3210496.x.

Abstract

In our increasingly litigious society there is persistence of an attitude that posttraumatic headache (or other injuries) will either improve or disappear following resolution of a claim. In some states (Florida) in order for a person to initiate a claim, an injury must be considered permanent. This is often a difficult task with a subjective symptom. This retrospective study was performed to evaluate the reliability of criteria used to diagnose a "permanent" posttraumatic headache and whether these headaches stay "permanent" after legal settlement. Data was obtained by a structured telephone interview of fifty adult outpatients diagnosed as having permanent posttraumatic headache and their litigation settled at least one year previously. Patients with previous headaches, other accidents or head injuries were excluded. The average length of time from settlement to interview was 23 months. Forty-six had been in automobile accidents and four either had falls or blunt trauma to the head. (Eight cases involved Workman's Compensation). Criteria used at this clinic for determining permanency were either posttraumatic headache persisting for longer than one year with no evidence of further improvement (43 patients) or patients with headaches persisting longer than 6 months with a plateau (no change) in their pattern for three months or more with an adequate trial of treatment (in our judgement). These criteria did seem reliable. All fifty patients interviewed continued to report persistent headache symptoms one year or more following legal settlement. Improvement in headache pattern after legal settlement was only reported by four patients.

摘要

在我们这个诉讼日益增多的社会中,一直存在一种态度,即创伤后头痛(或其他损伤)在索赔解决后会好转或消失。在一些州(佛罗里达州),为了让一个人提起索赔,损伤必须被认定为永久性的。对于主观症状来说,这往往是一项艰巨的任务。进行这项回顾性研究是为了评估用于诊断“永久性”创伤后头痛的标准的可靠性,以及这些头痛在法律解决后是否仍保持“永久性”。通过对五十名被诊断患有永久性创伤后头痛且其诉讼至少在一年前已解决的成年门诊患者进行结构化电话访谈来获取数据。排除有既往头痛史、其他事故或头部损伤的患者。从解决到访谈的平均时间为23个月。其中四十六人曾遭遇汽车事故,四人头部有跌倒或钝器伤。(八例涉及工伤赔偿)。该诊所用于确定永久性的标准是创伤后头痛持续超过一年且无进一步改善的证据(43例患者),或者头痛持续超过6个月且在经过充分的治疗试验(我们判断)后其模式平稳(无变化)达三个月或更长时间(7例患者)。这些标准似乎确实可靠。所有接受访谈的五十名患者在法律解决后一年或更长时间仍继续报告有持续的头痛症状。只有四名患者报告在法律解决后头痛模式有所改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验