Pheby D F H, Levine D F, Pitcher R W, Shepherd N A
Unit of Applied Epidemiology, University of the West of England, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK.
J Clin Pathol. 2004 Jan;57(1):43-7. doi: 10.1136/jcp.57.1.43.
To assess the quality of histopathology reporting and accuracy of Dukes's staging of colorectal cancers in the former South Western Health region and to determine the impact of numbers of lymph nodes examined on stage ascription.
Histopathology reports of colorectal cancer for 1993-7 were analysed. Completeness was assessed regarding reported numbers of lymph nodes examined, numbers found positive, Dukes's stage, and ICD9 code. Numbers of lymph nodes examined, numbers found positive, and Dukes's stage were recorded. Results from one hospital known to have high standards of reporting were compared with those from elsewhere.
In total, 629 reports were examined from the reference hospital and 918 from elsewhere. Fewer than one in 20 (4.3%) reports from the reference hospital were incomplete, compared with a third (36.1%) elsewhere. The average number of nodes examined for each case at the reference hospital was 18.81 and 6.41 elsewhere. The average number of positive nodes for each case was 2.47 at the reference hospital and 1.15 elsewhere. The proportion of Dukes's stage C cases was significantly higher at the reference hospital than elsewhere. Ascertainment of Dukes's stage C cases was related to number of lymph nodes examined, with optimal ascertainment levels when at least 10 and fewer than 15 nodes were examined.
Standards of histopathology reporting, and ascertainment of Dukes's stage C, were significantly higher at the reference hospital. Variations in ascertainment levels of Dukes's stage C disease mainly resulted from variations in the numbers of lymph nodes examined.
评估前西南卫生区域内结直肠癌组织病理学报告的质量以及 Dukes 分期的准确性,并确定检查的淋巴结数量对分期归属的影响。
分析 1993 - 1997 年结直肠癌的组织病理学报告。评估报告中检查的淋巴结数量、发现阳性的数量、Dukes 分期和 ICD9 编码的完整性。记录检查的淋巴结数量、发现阳性的数量和 Dukes 分期。将一家已知报告标准较高的医院的结果与其他地方的结果进行比较。
总共检查了参考医院的 629 份报告和其他地方的 918 份报告。参考医院不到二十分之一(4.3%)的报告不完整,而其他地方为三分之一(36.1%)。参考医院每个病例检查的淋巴结平均数量为 18.81 个,其他地方为 6.41 个。参考医院每个病例阳性淋巴结的平均数量为 2.47 个,其他地方为 1.15 个。参考医院 Dukes C 期病例的比例显著高于其他地方。Dukes C 期病例的确定与检查的淋巴结数量有关,检查至少 10 个且少于 15 个淋巴结时确定水平最佳。
参考医院的组织病理学报告标准以及 Dukes C 期的确定明显更高。Dukes C 期疾病确定水平的差异主要源于检查的淋巴结数量的差异。