Suppr超能文献

在儿童预防性保健中检测5至6岁儿童的心理社会问题:用于儿童心理社会问题检测评估程序的简短问卷的效度

Detecting psychosocial problems among 5-6-year-old children in preventive Child Health Care: the validity of a short questionnaire used in an assessment procedure for detecting psychosocial problems among children.

作者信息

Vogels T, Reijneveld S A, Brugman E, den Hollander-Gijsman M, Verhulst F C, Verloove-Vanhorick S P

机构信息

TNO Prevention and Health, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2003 Dec;13(4):353-60. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/13.4.353.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An extended re-assessment of the psychometric properties of the LSPPK, an instrument aimed at identifying children with emotional and behavioural problems.

METHODS

Data came from a national sample in The Netherlands of parents of 1248 children (aged 5-6 years) interviewed by child health professionals (CHP). Data were obtained regarding psychosocial problems, treatment status and scores on the LSPPK (Parent and CHP Index), and on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). The scale structure, reliability, criterion and content validity and added value of the LSPPK were assessed using the CBCL and treatment status as criteria.

RESULTS

The scale structure corresponded with that found originally; the LSPPK improved the prediction of problems according to the CBCL, compared to predictions using readily available risk indicators alone. Reliability varied between 0.55 and 0.69. For the LSPPK Parent Index, sensitivity varied between 0.42 and 0.50. For the CHP Index sensitivity varied between 0.60 and 0.96, but specificity varied between 0.76 and 0.79. Both indices were very sensitive for attention and social problems, but less so for other problems.

CONCLUSION

The LSPPK Parent Index cannot distinguish sufficiently between children with or without serious problems. Either too many children with problems remain unnoticed or too many children without problems are labelled as a case. The LSPPK CHP Index, reflecting the CHP's interpretation of the Parent Index after interviewing the parents does not compensate adequately for the weaknesses of the Parent Index. Better assessment procedures and strategies need to be developed.

摘要

背景

对LSPPK(一种旨在识别有情绪和行为问题儿童的工具)的心理测量特性进行扩展重新评估。

方法

数据来自荷兰全国范围内由儿童健康专业人员(CHP)对1248名儿童(5 - 6岁)的父母进行访谈的样本。获取了有关心理社会问题、治疗状况以及LSPPK(家长指数和CHP指数)和儿童行为清单(CBCL)得分的数据。以CBCL和治疗状况为标准,评估LSPPK的量表结构、信度、效标效度、内容效度和附加值。

结果

量表结构与最初发现的一致;与仅使用现成风险指标进行预测相比,LSPPK根据CBCL改进了对问题的预测。信度在0.55至0.69之间变化。对于LSPPK家长指数,敏感度在0.42至0.50之间变化。对于CHP指数,敏感度在0.60至0.96之间变化,但特异度在0.76至0.79之间变化。两个指数对注意力和社交问题都非常敏感,但对其他问题则不然。

结论

LSPPK家长指数无法充分区分有或没有严重问题的儿童。要么有太多有问题的儿童未被注意到,要么有太多没有问题的儿童被标记为病例。LSPPK CHP指数反映了CHP在访谈家长后对家长指数的解读,并未充分弥补家长指数的弱点。需要开发更好的评估程序和策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验