• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每天走多少步才算足够?公共卫生领域的初步计步器指标。

How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health.

作者信息

Tudor-Locke Catrine, Bassett David R

机构信息

Department of Exercise and Wellness, Arizona State University, Mesa, Arizona 85212, USA.

出版信息

Sports Med. 2004;34(1):1-8. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200434010-00001.

DOI:10.2165/00007256-200434010-00001
PMID:14715035
Abstract

Pedometers are simple and inexpensive body-worn motion sensors that are readily being used by researchers and practitioners to assess and motivate physical activity behaviours. Pedometer-determined physical activity indices are needed to guide their efforts. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to review the rationale and evidence for general pedometer-based indices for research and practice purposes. Specifically, we evaluate popular recommendations for steps/day and attempt to translate existing physical activity guidelines into steps/day equivalents. Also, we appraise the fragmented evidence currently available from associations derived from cross-sectional studies and a limited number of interventions that have documented improvements (primarily in body composition and/or blood pressure) with increased steps/day.A value of 10000 steps/day is gaining popularity with the media and in practice and can be traced to Japanese walking clubs and a business slogan 30+ years ago. 10000 steps/day appears to be a reasonable estimate of daily activity for apparently healthy adults and studies are emerging documenting the health benefits of attaining similar levels. Preliminary evidence suggests that a goal of 10000 steps/day may not be sustainable for some groups, including older adults and those living with chronic diseases. Another concern about using 10000 steps/day as a universal step goal is that it is probably too low for children, an important target population in the war against obesity. Other approaches to pedometer-determined physical activity recommendations that are showing promise of health benefit and individual sustainability have been based on incremental improvements relative to baseline values. Based on currently available evidence, we propose the following preliminary indices be used to classify pedometer-determined physical activity in healthy adults: (i). <5000 steps/day may be used as a 'sedentary lifestyle index'; (ii). 5000-7499 steps/day is typical of daily activity excluding sports/exercise and might be considered 'low active'; (iii). 7500-9999 likely includes some volitional activities (and/or elevated occupational activity demands) and might be considered 'somewhat active'; and (iv). >or=10000 steps/day indicates the point that should be used to classify individuals as 'active'. Individuals who take >12500 steps/day are likely to be classified as 'highly active'.

摘要

计步器是一种简单且价格低廉的可穿戴式运动传感器,研究人员和从业者正广泛使用它来评估和激励身体活动行为。需要计步器确定的身体活动指标来指导他们的工作。因此,本文的目的是回顾基于计步器的一般指标用于研究和实践目的的基本原理和证据。具体而言,我们评估了每日步数的流行建议,并尝试将现有的身体活动指南转化为每日步数的等效值。此外,我们评估了目前从横断面研究得出的关联以及少数干预措施中获得的零散证据,这些干预措施记录了随着每日步数增加(主要在身体成分和/或血压方面)而出现的改善情况。

每天一万步的数值在媒体和实践中越来越流行,其可以追溯到30多年前的日本步行俱乐部和一句商业口号。对于明显健康的成年人来说,每天一万步似乎是对日常活动的合理估计,并且越来越多的研究记录了达到类似步数水平对健康的益处。初步证据表明,对于包括老年人和慢性病患者在内的一些群体,每天一万步的目标可能无法持续。将每天一万步作为通用步数目标的另一个问题是,对于儿童(对抗肥胖的重要目标人群)来说,这个数值可能太低了。其他基于计步器确定身体活动建议的方法,显示出对健康有益且具有个体可持续性的前景,这些方法是基于相对于基线值的逐步改善。基于目前可得的证据,我们建议使用以下初步指标对健康成年人中计步器确定的身体活动进行分类:(i). 每天少于5000步可用作“久坐生活方式指标”;(ii). 每天5000 - 7499步是不包括运动/锻炼的日常活动典型步数,可能被视为“低活动量”;(iii). 每天7500 - 9999步可能包括一些自主活动(和/或较高的职业活动需求),可能被视为“有些活跃”;以及(iv). 每天大于或等于10000步表明应将个体分类为“活跃”的步数点。每天步数超过12500步的个体可能被分类为“高度活跃”。

相似文献

1
How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health.每天走多少步才算足够?公共卫生领域的初步计步器指标。
Sports Med. 2004;34(1):1-8. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200434010-00001.
2
Why do pedometers work?: a reflection upon the factors related to successfully increasing physical activity.计步器为何有效?——对与成功增加身体活动相关因素的反思。
Sports Med. 2009;39(12):981-93. doi: 10.2165/11319600-000000000-00000.
3
How many steps/day are enough? For older adults and special populations.每天走多少步才足够?针对老年人和特殊人群。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Jul 28;8:80. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-80.
4
How many steps/day are enough? for children and adolescents.每天需要走多少步?针对儿童和青少年。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Jul 28;8:78. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-78.
5
How many steps/day are enough? For adults.每天走多少步才足够?针对成年人。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Jul 28;8:79. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-79.
6
Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of free-living physical activity.计步器与加速度计对日常身体活动测量的比较。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Dec;34(12):2045-51. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200212000-00027.
7
Cardiometabolic risk in younger and older adults across an index of ambulatory activity.不同年龄段成年人动态活动指数中的心血管代谢风险。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Oct;37(4):278-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.05.020.
8
A step-defined sedentary lifestyle index: <5000 steps/day.一个明确的久坐生活方式指数:<5000 步/天。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013 Feb;38(2):100-14. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2012-0235. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
9
A cross-sectional study of the individual, social, and built environmental correlates of pedometer-based physical activity among elementary school children.一项横断面研究,旨在探讨小学生基于计步器的身体活动与个体、社会和建筑环境因素之间的关系。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Apr 12;8:30. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-30.
10
Short-term effects of using pedometers to increase daily physical activity in smokers: a randomized trial.使用计步器增加吸烟者日常身体活动的短期效果:一项随机试验。
Respir Care. 2012 Jul;57(7):1089-97. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01458. Epub 2012 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Prehabilitation Prior to Chemotherapy in Humans: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions.人类化疗前的康复治疗:当前证据与未来方向综述
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 15;17(16):2670. doi: 10.3390/cancers17162670.
2
Upper extremity functional exercise capacity, muscle oxygenation, respiratory muscle strength, and physical activity levels in patients underwent pneumonectomy for lung cancer: a cross-sectional study.肺癌肺叶切除术后患者的上肢功能运动能力、肌肉氧合、呼吸肌力量及身体活动水平:一项横断面研究
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Aug 1;33(8):739. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09731-z.
3
Psychometric Properties of Physical Activity Questionnaires for Children and Adolescents: An Updated Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity and Reliability issues in Objective Monitoring of Physical Activity.身体活动客观监测中的效度和信度问题
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000 Jun;71 Suppl 2:30-6. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2000.11082783.
2
Objective monitoring of physical activity using motion sensors and heart rate.使用运动传感器和心率对身体活动进行客观监测。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000 Jun;71 Suppl 2:21-9. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2000.11082782.
3
Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions.在可控条件下对计步器和加速度计准确性的比较。
儿童和青少年身体活动问卷的心理测量特性:一项更新的系统评价。
Sports Med. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02270-x.
4
Efficacy of a theory-based and tailored mHealth intervention promoting walking behavior: a preliminary randomized controlled trial.一项基于理论且量身定制的促进步行行为的移动健康干预措施的效果:一项初步随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 18;15(1):26033. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09634-3.
5
Walking cadence as a measure of activity intensity and impact on functional capacity for prefrail and frail older adults.行走节奏作为虚弱前期和虚弱老年人活动强度的衡量指标及其对功能能力的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 16;20(7):e0323759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323759. eCollection 2025.
6
Trajectories of Physical Disabilities Over Six Months in Patients With Long COVID.新冠后综合征患者六个月内身体残疾的轨迹
Phys Ther. 2025 Jul 7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaf091.
7
A Culturally Tailored mHealth Intervention (MobileMen App) to Promote Physical Activity in African American Men: Protocol for a Comparative Effectiveness Trial.一种针对非裔美国男性促进身体活动的文化定制移动健康干预措施(MobileMen应用程序):一项比较效果试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 4;14:e67809. doi: 10.2196/67809.
8
Step-Count Distribution as an Indicator of Walking Reserve in People with Gait Vulnerabilities.步数分布作为步态易损人群步行储备指标
Can Geriatr J. 2025 Jun 4;28(2):115-124. doi: 10.5770/cgj.28.763. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Resilience and renewal: the personal impact of physical activity in breast cancer survivors.恢复力与重生:身体活动对乳腺癌幸存者的个人影响
BMC Womens Health. 2025 May 27;25(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03791-3.
10
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the older adult lifestyle scale: a translation and validation study.老年人生活方式量表中文版的心理测量学评估:一项翻译与验证研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 28;13:1539685. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1539685. eCollection 2025.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 May;35(5):867-71. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000064996.63632.10.
4
Obesity and the environment: where do we go from here?肥胖与环境:我们将何去何从?
Science. 2003 Feb 7;299(5608):853-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1079857.
5
Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of free-living physical activity.计步器与加速度计对日常身体活动测量的比较。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Dec;34(12):2045-51. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200212000-00027.
6
Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2000.1999 - 2000年美国成年人肥胖症的患病率及趋势
JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1723-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1723.
7
Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: convergent validity.计步器在评估身体活动方面的效用:收敛效度。
Sports Med. 2002;32(12):795-808. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200232120-00004.
8
Contribution of structured exercise class participation and informal walking for exercise to daily physical activity in community-dwelling older adults.结构化运动课程参与和非正式步行锻炼对社区居住老年人日常身体活动的贡献。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2002 Sep;73(3):350-6. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2002.10609031.
9
Preliminary outcome evaluation of the First Step Program: a daily physical activity intervention for individuals with type 2 diabetes.“第一步计划”的初步结果评估:一项针对2型糖尿病患者的日常身体活动干预措施
Patient Educ Couns. 2002 May;47(1):23-8. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(01)00169-0.
10
Development of a theory-based daily activity intervention for individuals with type 2 diabetes.为2型糖尿病患者开发一种基于理论的日常活动干预措施。
Diabetes Educ. 2001 Jan-Feb;27(1):85-93. doi: 10.1177/014572170102700110.