Zuideveld Klaas P, Van der Graaf Piet H, Newgreen Donald, Thurlow Richard, Petty Nicola, Jordan Paul, Peletier Lambertus A, Danhof Meindert
Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Division of Pharmacology, Gorlaeus Laboratory, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004 Mar;308(3):1012-20. doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.059030. Epub 2004 Jan 8.
The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) correlations of seven prototypical 5-HT(1A) agonists were analyzed on the basis of a recently proposed semi-mechanistic PK-PD model for the effect on body temperature. The resulting concentration-effect relationships were subsequently analyzed on the basis of the operational model of agonism to estimate the operational affinity (pK(A)) and efficacy (log tau) at the 5-HT(1A) receptor in vivo. The values obtained in this manner were compared with estimates of the affinity (pK(i)) and intrinsic efficacy (log[agonist ratio]) in a receptor-binding assay. Between 5-HT(1A) agonists wide differences in in vivo affinity and efficacy were observed, with values of the pK(A) ranging from 5.67 for flesinoxan to 8.63 for WAY-100,635 [N-(2-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl)ethyl)-N-2-pyridinyl-cyclohexanecarboxamide] and of the log tau ranging from -1.27 for WAY-100,135 [N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-alpha-phenyl-1-piperazine-propanamide] to 0.62 for R-(+)-8-hydroxy-2-[di-n-propylamino)tetralin. Poor correlations were observed between the in vivo receptor affinity (pK(A)) and the affinity estimates in the in vitro receptor binding assay (pK(i); r(2) = 0.55, P > 0.05), which could in part be explained by differences in blood-brain distribution. In contrast, a highly significant correlation was observed between the efficacy parameters in vivo (log tau) and in vitro (log [agonist ratio]; r(2) = 0.76, P < 0.05). Thus by combining the previously proposed semi-mechanistic PK-PD model for the effect on body temperature with the operational model of agonism, a full mechanistic PK-PD model for 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists has been obtained, which is highly predictive of the in vivo intrinsic efficacy.
基于最近提出的一个关于对体温影响的半机制药代动力学-药效学(PK-PD)模型,分析了七种典型5-HT(1A)激动剂的PK-PD相关性。随后,基于激动作用的操作模型分析所得的浓度-效应关系,以估计体内5-HT(1A)受体的操作亲和力(pK(A))和效能(log tau)。将以这种方式获得的值与受体结合试验中亲和力(pK(i))和内在效能(log[激动剂比率])的估计值进行比较。在5-HT(1A)激动剂之间,观察到体内亲和力和效能存在很大差异,pK(A)值范围从氟司必林的5.67到WAY-100,635 [N-(2-(4-(2-甲氧基苯基)-1-哌嗪基)乙基)-N-2-吡啶基-环己烷甲酰胺]的8.63,log tau范围从WAY-100,135 [N-(1,1-二甲基乙基)-4-(2-甲氧基苯基)-α-苯基-1-哌嗪-丙酰胺]的-1.27到R-(+)-8-羟基-2-[二正丙基氨基)四氢萘的0.62。体内受体亲和力(pK(A))与体外受体结合试验中的亲和力估计值(pK(i))之间观察到较差的相关性(r(2)=0.55,P>0.05),这部分可由血脑分布差异来解释。相反,在体内效能参数(log tau)与体外效能参数(log[激动剂比率])之间观察到高度显著的相关性(r(2)=0.76,P<0.05)。因此,通过将先前提出的关于对体温影响的半机制PK-PD模型与激动作用的操作模型相结合,已获得一个用于5-HT(1A)受体激动剂的完整机制PK-PD模型,该模型对体内内在效能具有高度预测性。