Streitberger K, Diefenbacher M, Bauer A, Conradi R, Bardenheuer H, Martin E, Schneider A, Unnebrink K
Department of Anaesthesiology, Coordination Centre for Clinical Trials, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Anaesthesia. 2004 Feb;59(2):142-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03577.x.
This randomised, placebo-controlled, patient and observer blinded trial was conducted to determine whether acupuncture at the acupuncture point P6 is effective in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) compared to placebo acupuncture. Female patients (n = 220) scheduled for gynaecological or breast surgery were randomly assigned to two groups receiving either acupuncture (n = 109) or placebo acupuncture (n = 111). Each group was stratified for type of surgery and included two subgroups receiving intervention either before or after induction of anaesthesia. The incidence of PONV and/or antiemetic rescue medication within 24 h after surgery was the main outcome measure which showed no statistically significant difference between groups (43.7% acupuncture, 50.9% placebo, p = 0.27). The differences were more pronounced for patients having gynaecological surgery (48.9% acupuncture, 67.6% placebo, p = 0.07) than for those having breast surgery (38.7% acupuncture, 40.3% placebo, p = 0.86). The secondary outcome, vomiting, was significantly reduced by acupuncture from 39.6% to 24.8% (p = 0.03). Subgroup analysis showed no difference between applications of acupuncture before compared to after induction of anaesthesia.
这项随机、安慰剂对照、患者和观察者双盲试验旨在确定与安慰剂针刺相比,针刺内关穴在预防术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)方面是否有效。计划进行妇科或乳腺手术的女性患者(n = 220)被随机分为两组,分别接受针刺治疗(n = 109)或安慰剂针刺治疗(n = 111)。每组根据手术类型进行分层,包括在麻醉诱导前或后接受干预的两个亚组。术后24小时内PONV和/或使用止吐救援药物的发生率是主要观察指标,结果显示两组之间无统计学显著差异(针刺组为43.7%,安慰剂组为50.9%,p = 0.27)。对于接受妇科手术的患者,差异比接受乳腺手术的患者更明显(针刺组为48.9%,安慰剂组为67.6%,p = 0.07)(针刺组为38.7%,安慰剂组为40.3%,p = 0.86)。次要观察指标呕吐,针刺治疗后从39.6%显著降至24.8%(p = 0.03)。亚组分析显示,麻醉诱导前与后进行针刺治疗之间无差异。