Schaefer-Graf Ute M, Kjos Siri L, Fauzan Ostary H, Bühling Kai J, Siebert Gerda, Bührer Christoph, Ladendorf Barbara, Dudenhausen Joachim W, Vetter Klaus
Department of Obstetrics, Vivantes Medical Center Neukoelln, and Charité, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
Diabetes Care. 2004 Feb;27(2):297-302. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.2.297.
To compare the management of Caucasian women with gestational diabetes (GDM) based predominantly on monthly fetal growth ultrasound examinations with an approach based solely on maternal glycemia.
Women with GDM who attained fasting capillary glucose (FCG) <120 mg/dl and 2-h postprandial capillary glucose (2h-CG) <200 mg/dl after 1 week of diet were randomized to management based on maternal glycemia alone (standard) or glycemia plus ultrasound. In the standard group, insulin was initiated if FCG was repeatedly >90 mg/dl or 2h-CG was >120 mg/dl. In the ultrasound group, thresholds were 120 and 200 mg/dl, respectively, or a fetal abdominal circumference >75th percentile (AC>p75). Outcome criteria were rates of C-section, small-for-gestational-age (SGA) or large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants, neonatal hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dl), and neonatal care admission.
Maternal characteristics and fetal AC>p75 (36.0 vs. 38.4%) at entry did not differ between the standard (n = 100) and ultrasound groups (n = 99). Assignment to (30.0 vs. 40.4%) and mean duration of insulin treatment (8.3 vs. 8.1 weeks) did not differ between groups. In the ultrasound group, AC>p75 was the sole indication for insulin. The ultrasound-based strategy, as compared with the maternal glycemia-only strategy, resulted in a different treatment assignment in 34% of women. Rates of C-section (19.0 vs. 18.2%), LGA (10.0 vs. 12.1%), SGA (13.0 vs. 12.1%), hypoglycemia (16.0 vs. 17.0%), and admission (15.0 vs. 14.1%) did not differ significantly.
GDM management based on fetal growth combined with high glycemic criteria provides outcomes equivalent to management based on strict glycemic criteria alone. Inclusion of fetal growth might provide the opportunity to reduce glucose testing in low-risk pregnancies.
比较主要基于每月胎儿生长超声检查对白人妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)女性的管理方式与仅基于母体血糖水平的管理方式。
饮食1周后空腹毛细血管血糖(FCG)<120mg/dl且餐后2小时毛细血管血糖(2h-CG)<200mg/dl的GDM女性被随机分为仅基于母体血糖水平管理(标准组)或血糖水平加超声检查管理。在标准组中,如果FCG反复>90mg/dl或2h-CG>120mg/dl,则开始使用胰岛素。在超声检查组中,阈值分别为120mg/dl和200mg/dl,或胎儿腹围>第75百分位数(AC>p75)。结果标准为剖宫产率、小于胎龄儿(SGA)或大于胎龄儿(LGA)、新生儿低血糖(<40mg/dl)以及新生儿护理入院率。
标准组(n = 100)和超声检查组(n = 99)的母体特征以及入组时胎儿AC>p75(36.0%对38.4%)无差异。两组间胰岛素治疗的分配比例(30.0%对40.4%)和平均治疗持续时间(8.3周对8.1周)无差异。在超声检查组中,AC>p75是使用胰岛素的唯一指征。与仅基于母体血糖水平的策略相比,基于超声的策略使3散的女性有不同的治疗分配。剖宫产率(19.0%对18.2%)、LGA(10.0%对12.1%)、SGA(13.0%对12.1%)、低血糖(16.0%对17.0%)以及入院率(15.0%对14.1%)无显著差异。
基于胎儿生长并结合高血糖标准的GDM管理方式与仅基于严格血糖标准的管理方式效果相当。纳入胎儿生长情况可能为减少低风险妊娠的血糖检测提供机会。