Levin Kate A
MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, 4 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RZ, UK.
J Public Health Med. 2003 Dec;25(4):295-302. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdg084.
Previous research suggests that there are significant differences in health between urban and rural areas. The aim of this study is to describe the pattern and magnitude of urban-rural variation in health in Scotland and to examine the factors associated with health inequalities in urban and rural areas.
The data used in this study were limiting long-term illness (LLTI) and socio-economic data collected by the 1991 Census. A rurality indicator was created using Scottish Household Survey rurality classifications. Multilevel Poisson regression modelling was carried out with LLTI as a health indicator for each type of rurality within Scotland. A variety of socio-economic factors were investigated for each rurality.
Areas with the highest Standardized Illness Ratios (SIRs) (>125) are predominantly urban whereas the lowest SIRs (<75) are found in both urban and rural areas. Rural communities are more heterogeneous than urban areas in terms of their social make-up with relation to health; however, when these areas are split according to minor road length and different socio-economic factors are added, the model fit for each new model is improved and the reduction in total variation is comparable with that of the urban models.
These findings suggest that rural areas should not be treated as a homogeneous group but should be subdivided into rural types.
先前的研究表明,城乡地区的健康状况存在显著差异。本研究的目的是描述苏格兰城乡健康差异的模式和程度,并探讨城乡地区健康不平等的相关因素。
本研究使用的数据是1991年人口普查收集的长期疾病限制(LLTI)和社会经济数据。利用苏格兰家庭调查的农村分类创建了一个农村指标。以LLTI作为苏格兰境内每种农村类型的健康指标,进行了多层次泊松回归建模。针对每种农村类型,研究了各种社会经济因素。
标准化疾病比率(SIRs)最高(>125)的地区主要是城市地区,而最低的SIRs(<75)则出现在城市和农村地区。就健康方面的社会构成而言,农村社区比城市地区更加多样化;然而,当根据次要道路长度对这些地区进行划分并加入不同的社会经济因素时,每个新模型的拟合度都有所提高,总变异的减少与城市模型相当。
这些发现表明,农村地区不应被视为一个同质化的群体,而应细分为不同的农村类型。