Kielstein Jan T, Kretschmer Ulrich, Ernst Thomas, Hafer Carsten, Bahr Matthias J, Haller Hermann, Fliser Danilo
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2004 Feb;43(2):342-9. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.10.021.
Extended dialysis is an increasingly used modality of renal replacement therapy that theoretically offers advantages of both intermittent and continuous therapies in the intensive care unit (ICU).
We randomly treated 39 ventilated critically ill patients with oliguric acute renal failure with either continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH; n = 19; age, 50.1 +/- 3.2 years; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Assessment II [APACHE II] score, 32.3 +/- 1.2; 79% sepsis) and a substitution fluid rate of at least 30 mL/kg/h for 24 hours or with extended dialysis for 12 hours (n = 20; age, 50.8 +/- 3.6 years; APACHE II score, 33.6 +/- 1.0; 85% sepsis). The latter was performed using an easy-to-handle, single-pass, batch dialysis system. All hemodynamic parameters were monitored invasively by means of an indwelling arterial catheter.
Average mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, and catecholamine dose were not significantly different in both therapies. Urea reduction rate was similar with extended dialysis compared with CVVH therapy (53% +/- 2% versus 52% +/- 3%; P = not significant) despite an average rate of substitution fluid with the latter of 3.2 +/- 0.1 L/h. This was corroborated by the finding of similar amounts of urea eliminated in the collected spent total hemofiltration and dialysis fluid. Correction of acidosis was accomplished faster with extended dialysis than CVVH, and the amount of heparin used was significantly lower with extended dialysis (P < 0.01).
Extended dialysis combines excellent detoxification with cardiovascular tolerability, even in severely ill patients in the ICU. The technically simple dialysis system used offers flexibility of treatment time.
