Scher Howard I, Eisenberger Mario, D'Amico Anthony V, Halabi Susan, Small Eric J, Morris Michael, Kattan Michael W, Roach Mack, Kantoff Philip, Pienta Kenneth J, Carducci Michael A, Agus David, Slovin Susan F, Heller Glenn, Kelly William Kevin, Lange Paul H, Petrylak Daniel, Berg William, Higano Celestra, Wilding George, Moul Judd W, Partin Alan N, Logothetis Christopher, Soule Howard R
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Feb 1;22(3):537-56. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.099.
To define methodology to show clinical benefit for patients in the state of a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA).
A clinical states framework was used to address the hypothesis that definitive phase III trials could not be conducted in this patient population.
The Group focused on men with systemic (nonlocalized) recurrence and a defined risk of developing clinically detectable metastases. Models to define systemic versus local recurrence, and risk of metastatic progression were discussed.
Therapies that have shown favorable effects in more advanced clinical states; meaningful biologic surrogates of activity linked with efficacy in other tumor types; and/or effects on a target or pathway known to contribute to prostate cancer progression in this state can be considered for evaluation.
An intervention-specific posttherapy PSA-based outcome definition that would justify further testing should be described at the outset. Reporting: Trial reports should include a table showing the number of patients who achieve a specific PSA-based outcome, the number who remain enrolled onto the trial, and the number who came off study at different time points. The term PSA response should be abandoned.
The phases of drug development for this state are optimizing dose and schedule, demonstration of a treatment effect, and clinical benefit. To move a drug forward should require a high bar that includes no rise in PSA in a defined proportion of patients for a specified period of time at a minimum. Agents that do not produce this effect can only be tested in combination. The preferred end point of clinical benefit is prostate cancer-specific survival; the time to development of metastatic disease is an alternative.
Methodology to show that an intervention alters the natural history of prostate cancer is described. At each stage of development, only agents with sufficient activity should be moved forward.
确定在前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)升高状态下显示对患者临床益处的方法。
使用临床状态框架来解决在该患者群体中无法进行确定性III期试验的假设。
该小组关注有全身(非局限性)复发且有发生临床可检测转移风险的男性。讨论了定义全身复发与局部复发以及转移进展风险的模型。
可考虑评估在更晚期临床状态下显示出良好效果的疗法;与其他肿瘤类型的疗效相关的有意义的生物学替代指标;和/或对已知在此状态下促成前列腺癌进展的靶点或途径的影响。
应在一开始就描述基于PSA的干预特异性治疗后结果定义,该定义可为进一步测试提供依据。报告:试验报告应包括一个表格,显示达到基于PSA的特定结果的患者数量、仍参与试验的患者数量以及在不同时间点退出研究的患者数量。应摒弃“PSA反应”一词。
针对该状态的药物开发阶段包括优化剂量和给药方案、证明治疗效果以及临床益处。推进一种药物需要很高的标准,至少包括在规定时间段内一定比例的患者PSA不升高。未产生这种效果的药物只能联合测试。临床益处的首选终点是前列腺癌特异性生存;发生转移性疾病的时间是另一种选择。
描述了显示干预改变前列腺癌自然病程的方法。在每个开发阶段,仅应推进具有足够活性的药物。