Schauer C S, Lardy G P, Slanger W D, Bauer M L, Sedivec K K
Department of Animal and Range Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2004 Jan;82(1):298-306. doi: 10.2527/2004.821298x.
Objectives of this research were to compare animal performance with or without supplementation, compare effectiveness of three intake limiters, and to examine seasonal changes in nutritive value of native range in south-central North Dakota. Treatments included 1) control (CONT; no supplement); 2) hand-fed (HF) supplement, with no chemical limiter; 3) 16% salt (NACL); 4) 5.25% ammonium chloride and ammonium sulfate (AS); and 5) 7% calcium hydroxide (CAOH). Supplements were based on wheat middlings, barley malt sprouts, and soybean hulls and were formulated to provide 40% of the CP intake and 32% of the NEm intake of 350-kg steers. Trials 1 and 2 each used 70 yearling steers (370.8 +/- 0.04 and 327.9 +/- 0.76 kg initial BW for Trials 1 and 2, respectively). In each year, four 28-d periods from the latter half of June through mid-October were used. Steers were stratified by weight and allotted randomly to treatments in 1 of 10 16-ha pastures (two pastures per treatment for each trial). In Trial 1, diet sampling began in the first 28-d period, but supplementation did not begin until the second 28-d period. In Trial 2, supplementation and diet collection began in the first 28-d period. Cation-anion differences (DCAD; Na + K - Cl - S) for NACL, AS, CAOH, and HF supplements were 151, -735, 160, and 166 mEq/ kg, respectively. In Trial 1, no treatment, period, or treatment x period effects for supplement intake were detected (P > or = 0.29). In Trial 2, a treatment x period interaction for supplement intake occurred (P = 0.005) because HF steers were offered a constant amount of supplement daily, whereas steers fed AS, CAOH, and NACL were allowed to consume ad libitum quantities of supplement. Average daily gain in Trial 1 was not affected (P = 0.21) by supplementation. In Trial 2, NACL, AS, and HF treatments had higher (P < or = 0.07) ADG than CONT. In Trial 1, final weights were not affected by supplementation (P = 0.23). In Trial 2, final weights of NACL- and HF-fed steers were greater than for CONT and CAOH steers (P < 0.10). In Trial 2, CONT steer final weights were lower than all supplemented treatments (P < 0.10). For yearling steers grazing native range, use of NACL as a limiter resulted in increased weight gains compared with using either CAOH or AS; however, no limiter that was tested restricted supplement intake as effectively as HF. More research is necessary to determine the optimum limiter level and the effect of forage quality on supplement intake.
本研究的目的是比较补饲与不补饲情况下的动物生产性能,比较三种采食量限制剂的效果,并研究北达科他州中南部天然牧场营养价值的季节性变化。处理方式包括:1)对照组(CONT;不补饲);2)人工投喂(HF)补饲料,不添加化学限制剂;3)16%的盐(NaCl);4)5.25%的氯化铵和硫酸铵(AS);5)7%的氢氧化钙(CaOH)。补饲料以小麦麸、大麦芽和大豆皮为基础配制,旨在为350千克的阉牛提供40%的粗蛋白摄入量和32%的净能摄入量。试验1和试验2各使用70头一岁阉牛(试验1和试验2初始体重分别为370.8±0.04千克和327.9±0.76千克)。每年,从6月下旬到10月中旬选取四个28天的时间段。阉牛按体重分层,随机分配到10个16公顷牧场中的1个(每个试验每个处理两个牧场)。在试验1中,日粮采样从第一个28天时间段开始,但补饲直到第二个28天时间段才开始。在试验2中,补饲和日粮采集从第一个28天时间段开始。NaCl、AS、CaOH和HF补饲料的阴阳离子差(DCAD;Na + K - Cl - S)分别为151、-735、160和166毫当量/千克。在试验1中,未检测到补饲量的处理、时间段或处理×时间段效应(P≥0.29)。在试验2中,补饲量出现了处理×时间段交互作用(P = 0.005),因为HF阉牛每天投喂固定量的补饲料,而饲喂AS、CaOH和NaCl的阉牛可自由采食补饲料。试验1中的平均日增重不受补饲影响(P = 0.21)。在试验2中,NaCl、AS和HF处理的平均日增重高于对照组(P≤0.07)。在试验1中,最终体重不受补饲影响(P = 0.23)。在试验2中,饲喂NaCl和HF的阉牛最终体重高于对照组和饲喂CaOH的阉牛(P < 0.10)。在试验2中,对照组阉牛的最终体重低于所有补饲处理组(P < 0.10)。对于在天然牧场放牧的一岁阉牛,与使用CaOH或AS相比,使用NaCl作为限制剂可增加体重;然而,所测试的限制剂中,没有一种能像HF那样有效地限制补饲料的采食量。需要更多研究来确定最佳限制剂水平以及牧草质量对补饲料采食量的影响。