Substrate binding and reduction of benzoyl-CoA reductase: evidence for nucleotide-dependent conformational changes.

Benzoyl-CoA reductase (BCR) from the denitrifying bacterium Thauera aromatica catalyzes the ATP driven two-electron reduction of the aromatic moiety of benzoyl-CoA (BCoA) to a nonaromatic cyclic diene (2 ATP/2 e(-)). The enzyme contains two similar but nonidentical ATP-binding sites of the acetate kinase/sugar kinase/Hsp70/actin family. To obtain further insights into the overall catalytic cycle of BCR, the binding affinities and stoichiometries of all substrates as well as their effects on reduction kinetics were studied by stopped-flow UV/vis spectroscopy, freeze-quench EPR spectroscopy, and equilibrium dialysis. BCR bound maximally two nucleotides and a single BCoA. The binding of a single nucleotide induced a molecular switch (BCR --> BCR) as evidenced as follows: (i) the reduction rate of BCR by sulfoxide radical anion was significantly decreased in the nucleotide-bound state, (ii) the binding of BCoA to the reduced enzyme strictly depended on bound nucleotides, and (iii) the nucleotide binding affinities increased up to 60-fold compared to the steady-state values. The "ATP-binding switch" is distinguished from the previously described "low-spin/high-spin switch" of a [4Fe-4S] cluster which strictly depends on ATP hydrolysis. The two nucleotide binding sites were occupied sequentially; binding constants of the two sites differed by a factor of 10-40. The kinetic data obtained suggest that the ATP-binding switch is a rather fast process (>100 s(-)(1)) with a switch equilibrium constant of 54 +/- 10. In contrast, the reverse switch back of the MgADP-bound enzyme (BCR --> BCR) is considered rate-limiting in the overall catalytic cycle of BCR (4 +/- 1 s(-)(1)). The binding of nucleotides did not affect the redox potential of the 4Fe-4S clusters; the switch is rather considered to alter the kinetics of internal electron transfer. Implications for the overall catalytic cycle of benzoyl-CoA reductase are discussed and compared with other ATP-hydrolyzing enzymes.