Suppr超能文献

一项关于三种治疗方式对下颌义齿问题患者有效性的随机前瞻性临床试验。一项关于患者满意度的10年随访研究。

A randomized prospective clinical trial on the effectiveness of three treatment modalities for patients with lower denture problems. A 10 year follow-up study on patient satisfaction.

作者信息

Raghoebar G M, Meijer H J A, van 't Hof M, Stegenga B, Vissink A

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Oct;32(5):498-503.

Abstract

Treatment of lower denture complaints of patients with an edentulous mandible with a height of at least 15 mm can consist of meticulous construction of a new set of dentures (CD), construction of a new set of dentures following preprosthetic surgery to enlarge the denture-bearing area (PPS), or construction of an implant-retained mandibular overdenture (IRO). The aim of this prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the satisfaction of the above mentioned treatment modalities in resolving lower denture related complaints. Ninety edentulous patients (Cawood class IV and V, mean mandibular height 20.7 +/- 2.7 mm) were randomly assigned to one of these treatment modalities. The main outcome parameters were denture satisfaction and chewing ability, which were assessed using validated self-administered questionnaires focusing on denture-related complaints and problems with chewing different types of food. These parameters were measured before treatment, and 1, 5 and 10 years after treatment. Differences among the three groups were tested by applying a one way analysis of variance and a Tukey's test for multiple comparison. At the 1 year evaluation, significantly better scores were observed in the two surgical groups (IRO, PPS) than in the CD group (P<0.05). At 5 year evaluation the 'complaints of the lower denture' showed a significantly better score in the IRO group when compared to the PPS and CD groups (P<0.05). No significant differences were observed between the PPS and CD group. At 10 year evaluation, the intention to treat analysis revealed no significant differences between the three groups, while a per protocol analysis showed that the IRO group was the most satisfied. From this study it is concluded that both on the short and long term denture satisfaction appears most favourable in the IRO group when compared to the PPS and CD groups. Implant-retained overdentures are, therefore, a favourable treatment modality for edentulous patients with lower denture problems.

摘要

对于下颌无牙且高度至少为15毫米的患者,下颌义齿相关问题的治疗方法可包括精心制作一套新义齿(CD)、在进行修复前手术以扩大义齿承托区后制作一套新义齿(PPS)或制作种植体固位的下颌覆盖义齿(IRO)。这项前瞻性随机对照临床试验的目的是评估上述治疗方式在解决下颌义齿相关问题方面的满意度。90名无牙患者(Cawood IV级和V级,平均下颌高度20.7 +/- 2.7毫米)被随机分配到这些治疗方式中的一种。主要结局参数是义齿满意度和咀嚼能力,使用经过验证的自我管理问卷进行评估,该问卷侧重于义齿相关问题以及咀嚼不同类型食物时的问题。这些参数在治疗前以及治疗后1年、5年和10年进行测量。通过应用单因素方差分析和用于多重比较的Tukey检验来检验三组之间的差异。在1年评估时,两个手术组(IRO,PPS)的得分明显优于CD组(P<0.05)。在5年评估时,与PPS组和CD组相比,IRO组的“下颌义齿相关问题”得分明显更好(P<0.05)。PPS组和CD组之间未观察到显著差异。在10年评估时,意向性分析显示三组之间无显著差异,而符合方案分析表明IRO组最满意。从这项研究得出的结论是,与PPS组和CD组相比,IRO组在短期和长期的义齿满意度似乎最有利。因此,种植体固位覆盖义齿是患有下颌义齿问题的无牙患者的一种有利治疗方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验