Leclerc F, Noizet O
Service de réanimation pédiatrique, hôpital Jeanne-de-Flandre, CHU de Lille, France.
Arch Pediatr. 2004 Feb;11(2):175-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2003.11.026.
Paediatric intensive care and haematological units are ideal sites for the development of nosocomial infections. These infections remain a significant source of mortality and morbidity and increase length of stay and costs. Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) includes topical antibiotics during the entire intensive care unit (ICU) stay, parenteral antibiotic administered for three to five days, hand hygiene and surveillance cultures of throat and rectum. Its use is based on the observation that resistant bacteria are often imported by the patients themselves, and the fact that transmission via the hands of carers could be responsible only for infections occurring after one week. In adult patients, seven meta-analyses have demonstrated that SDD reduces the odds ratio for lower airway infections, and sometimes mortality (particularly in surgical and trauma patients). The main criticism against SDD is the possible emergence of antibiotic resistant bacteria, which is a growing problem in Europe and United States of America. Only four studies on SDD in children have been reported in the literature: due to methodological weaknesses and small size of samples, definitive conclusion cannot be drawn. However, one study in a 20 bed paediatric intensive care unit has demonstrated that SDD prevent both infections and the emergence of resistant bacteria. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that more than 50% of children carrying resistant bacteria are detected within 24 hours of admission, suggesting that they import the resistant strains onto the intensive care unit. Factors that predict facility, administration of i.v. antibiotics within the past 12 months, previous intensive care unit admission and hospitalization of a household contact within the past 12 months. As suggested by several authors, the term selective should mean selection of appropriate patient groups (those at high risk of nosocomial infection, e.g. patients mechanically ventilated for at least 48 hours) and units (excluding those where multiresistance is endemic). Obviously, surveillance of patient and unit bacterial ecology and improvement of antibiotic policy must be reinforced.
儿科重症监护病房和血液科病房是医院感染发生的理想场所。这些感染仍然是导致死亡和发病的重要原因,会延长住院时间并增加费用。选择性消化道去污(SDD)包括在整个重症监护病房(ICU)住院期间局部使用抗生素、静脉注射抗生素三至五天、手部卫生以及对咽喉和直肠进行监测培养。其应用基于以下观察结果:耐药菌往往由患者自身带入,以及通过护理人员的手传播仅可能导致一周后发生的感染。在成年患者中,七项荟萃分析表明,SDD降低了下呼吸道感染的比值比,有时还能降低死亡率(尤其是在外科手术和创伤患者中)。对SDD的主要批评是可能会出现抗生素耐药菌,这在欧洲和美国是一个日益严重的问题。文献中仅报道了四项关于儿童SDD的研究:由于方法学上的缺陷和样本量小,无法得出明确结论。然而,一项在拥有20张床位的儿科重症监护病房进行的研究表明,SDD既能预防感染,又能防止耐药菌的出现。此外,已经证明超过50%携带耐药菌的儿童在入院后24小时内被检测到,这表明他们将耐药菌株带入了重症监护病房。预测因素包括设备情况、过去12个月内静脉注射抗生素的使用、既往入住重症监护病房以及过去12个月内家庭接触者的住院情况。正如几位作者所建议的,“选择性”一词应意味着选择合适的患者群体(那些有医院感染高风险的患者,例如机械通气至少48小时的患者)和病房(不包括多重耐药流行的病房)。显然,必须加强对患者和病房细菌生态学的监测以及改进抗生素政策。