Suppr超能文献

英夫利昔单抗在克罗恩病中定期和按需治疗策略的比较。

Comparison of scheduled and episodic treatment strategies of infliximab in Crohn's disease.

作者信息

Rutgeerts Paul, Feagan Brian G, Lichtenstein Gary R, Mayer Lloyd F, Schreiber Stefan, Colombel Jean Frederic, Rachmilewitz Daniel, Wolf Douglas C, Olson Allan, Bao Weihang, Hanauer Stephen B

机构信息

Afdeling Gastroenterologie, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Gastroenterology. 2004 Feb;126(2):402-13. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.11.014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: This analysis of Crohn's disease patients treated with infliximab in ACCENT I compared episodic and scheduled treatment strategies under conditions that simulate clinical practice.

METHODS

After 5 mg/kg infliximab at week 0, 573 patients were randomized to infusions at weeks 2 and 6 and every 8 weeks until week 46 of placebo (episodic), infliximab 5 mg/kg at weeks 2 and 6 followed by 5 mg/kg (5 mg/kg scheduled) every 8 weeks, or infliximab 5 mg/kg at weeks 2 and 6 followed by 10 mg/kg (10 mg/kg scheduled) every 8 weeks. At or after week 14, treatment could be given with a dose of infliximab 5 mg/kg higher upon loss of response.

RESULTS

The efficacy of scheduled infliximab therapy was better than episodic treatment. Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores were consistently significantly better in the 10 mg/kg scheduled maintenance group from weeks 10 to 54, and response and remission rates (combined scheduled) were significantly higher from weeks 10 to 30. A greater proportion of patients achieved complete mucosal healing at week 54 (P = 0.041). A lower proportion developed antibodies to infliximab in the scheduled groups than in the episodic group (9% [5 mg/kg], 6% [10 mg/kg], 28% [episodic], respectively). Scheduled strategy patients had fewer Crohn's disease-related hospitalizations (P = 0.014) and surgeries (P = 0.01) than episodic strategy patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The scheduled infliximab groups, particularly the 10 mg/kg group, had better CDAI and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) responses than those in the episodic group. Both scheduled groups had fewer hospitalizations, higher rates of mucosal healing, and fewer developed antibodies than those in the episodic group, with no increase in side effects.

摘要

背景与目的

本项对接受英夫利昔单抗治疗的克罗恩病患者进行的分析,是在模拟临床实践的条件下,对比间歇性和计划性治疗策略。

方法

在第0周给予5mg/kg英夫利昔单抗后,573例患者被随机分为三组,分别在第2周和第6周以及之后每8周接受安慰剂输注直至第46周(间歇性);在第2周和第6周接受5mg/kg英夫利昔单抗,随后每8周接受5mg/kg(5mg/kg计划性);或在第2周和第6周接受5mg/kg英夫利昔单抗,随后每8周接受10mg/kg(10mg/kg计划性)。在第14周及以后,如果出现反应丧失,可给予剂量增加5mg/kg的英夫利昔单抗治疗。

结果

计划性英夫利昔单抗治疗的疗效优于间歇性治疗。从第10周到第54周,10mg/kg计划性维持治疗组的克罗恩病活动指数(CDAI)评分始终显著更好,从第10周到第30周,反应率和缓解率(联合计划性)显著更高。在第54周,达到完全黏膜愈合的患者比例更高(P = 0.041)。计划性治疗组中产生英夫利昔单抗抗体的患者比例低于间歇性治疗组(分别为9%[5mg/kg]、6%[10mg/kg]、28%[间歇性])。计划性治疗策略的患者与间歇性治疗策略的患者相比,克罗恩病相关住院次数更少(P = 0.014),手术次数更少(P = 0.01)。

结论

计划性英夫利昔单抗组,尤其是10mg/kg组,与间歇性治疗组相比,在CDAI和炎症性肠病问卷(IBDQ)方面的反应更好。两个计划性治疗组的住院次数更少,黏膜愈合率更高,产生抗体的情况更少,且副作用未增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验