Singh P G, Hirsh I J
Central Institute for the Deaf, St. Louis, Missouri.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Nov;92(5):2650-61. doi: 10.1121/1.404381.
Harmonic complex tones comprising components in different spectral regions may differ considerably in timbre. While the pitch of "residue" tones of this type has been studied extensively, their timbral properties have received little attention. Discrimination of F0 for such tones is typically poorer than for complex tones with "corresponding" harmonics [A. Faulkner, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78, 1993-2004 (1985)]. The F0 DLs may be higher because timbre differences impair pitch discrimination. The present experiment explores effects of changes in spectral locus and F0 of harmonic complex tones on both pitch and timbre. Six normally hearing listeners indicated if the second tone of a two-tone sequence was: (1) same, (2) higher in pitch, (3) lower in pitch, (4) same in pitch but different in "something else," (5) higher in pitch and different in "something else," or (6) lower in pitch and different in "something else" than the first. ("Something else" is assumed to represent timbre.) The tones varied in spectral loci of four equal-amplitude harmonics m, m + 1, m + 2, and m + 3 (m = 1,2,3,4,5,6) and ranged in F0 from 200 to 200 +/- 2n Hz (n = 0,1,2,4,8,16,32). Results show that changes in F0 primarily affect pitch, and changes in spectral locus primarily affect timbre. However, a change in spectral locus can also influence pitch. The direction of locus change was reported as the direction of pitch change, despite no change in F0 or changes in F0 in the opposite direction for delta F0 < or = 0-2%. This implies that listeners may be attending to the "spectral pitch" of components, or to changes in a timbral attribute like "sharpness," which are construed as changes in overall pitch in the absence of strong F0 cues. For delta F0 > or = 2%, the direction of reported pitch change accord with the direction of F0 change, but the locus change continued to be reported as a timbre change. Rather than spectral-pitch matching of corresponding components, a context-dependent spectral evaluation process is thus implied in discernment of changes in pitch and timbre. Relative magnitudes of change in derived features of the spectrum such as harmonic number and F0, and absolute features such as spectral frequencies are compared. What is called "spectral pitch," contributes to the overall pitch, but also appears to be an important dimension of the multidimensional percept, timbre.
由不同频谱区域的成分组成的谐波复合音在音色上可能有很大差异。虽然对这类“残余”音的音高已经进行了广泛研究,但它们的音色特性却很少受到关注。对这类音的基频辨别通常比对具有“相应”谐波的复合音要差[A. 福克纳,《美国声学学会杂志》78,1993 - 2004(1985)]。基频差别阈可能更高,因为音色差异会损害音高辨别。本实验探究谐波复合音的频谱位置和基频变化对音高和音色的影响。六名听力正常的受试者指出双音序列中的第二个音与第一个音相比是:(1)相同,(2)音高高,(3)音高低,(4)音高相同但“其他方面”不同,(5)音高高且“其他方面”不同,或(6)音高低且“其他方面”不同。(“其他方面”假定代表音色。)这些音在四个等幅谐波m、m + 1、m + 2和m + 3(m = 1、2、3、4、5、6)的频谱位置上变化,基频范围为200至200 ± 2n Hz(n = 0、1、2、4、8、16、32)。结果表明,基频变化主要影响音高,频谱位置变化主要影响音色。然而,频谱位置的变化也会影响音高。尽管基频没有变化或对于ΔF0≤0 - 2%时基频朝相反方向变化,但频谱位置变化的方向仍被报告为音高变化的方向。这意味着受试者可能关注成分的“频谱音高”,或者关注像“尖锐度”这样的音色属性的变化,在没有强烈基频线索的情况下,这些变化被理解为整体音高的变化。对于ΔF0≥2%,报告的音高变化方向与基频变化方向一致,但频谱位置变化仍被报告为音色变化。因此,在辨别音高和音色变化时,隐含的不是相应成分的频谱音高匹配,而是一个依赖上下文的频谱评估过程。会比较频谱派生特征(如谐波数和基频)变化的相对大小以及绝对特征(如频谱频率)。所谓的“频谱音高”对整体音高有贡献,但似乎也是多维感知——音色的一个重要维度。