Gloor B, Kalman A
Augenklinik des Universitätsspitals Zürich.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1992 Nov;201(5):291-301. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1045906.
From 1987 to 1990 182 patients were treated for orbital lesions in the Department of Ophthalmology of the University of Zürich. 37% were tumors (without tumors of the vascular system), 20% inflammatory lesions, 12% lesions of the vascular system and tumors of it, the rest was not diagnosed. On this background the first of two chapters on orbital tumors deals with diagnosis, differential diagnosis, therapy and follow up of the capillary hemangioma, cavernous hemangioma, lymphangioma and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Although ultrasound echography, CT, MRI and angiography have greatly changed the diagnostic work up of orbital lesions, diagnosis is by far not made straight forward but often only after errors. To enhance diagnosis in the future this study is meant to analyse our misinterpretations. In the case of capillary hemangioma only complications justify an active treatment, normally the lesion resolves spontaneously. The infiltration of the upper eyelid with ptosis needs to be treated because of the risk of amblyopia. Our cases demonstrate, that the attempt of treatment with steroids is justified. Embolisation in the region of the a. ophthalmica is quite dangerous. The cavernous hemangioma only needs treatment in the case of compression of the optical nerve and total excision is not mandatory. The lymphangioma, although classified as benign tumor, can only be excised subtotally and with the danger of traumatising important structures of the orbit. The infiltrative growth and tendency of recurrence in fact is dangerous. It is important to diagnose the tumor without biopsy and to wait with surgical treatment as long as possible. The embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma itself is rare but it is the most frequent primary malignant tumor in childhood. Even accounting for being familiar with mimikri-false history of trauma, inflammation, hemangioma-like angiography-the diagnosis is often made rather late. Our cases demonstrate this and also the change of treatment in the last 30 years. Unfortunately the prognosis of the good results of chemotherapy in combination with radiation if necessary is clouded by the occurrence of secondary malignant tumors.
1987年至1990年期间,苏黎世大学眼科对182例眼眶病变患者进行了治疗。其中37%为肿瘤(不包括血管系统肿瘤),20%为炎性病变,12%为血管系统病变及血管系统肿瘤,其余病例未明确诊断。在此背景下,关于眼眶肿瘤的两章中的第一章论述了毛细血管瘤、海绵状血管瘤、淋巴管瘤和胚胎性横纹肌肉瘤的诊断、鉴别诊断、治疗及随访。尽管超声检查、CT、MRI和血管造影已极大地改变了眼眶病变的诊断流程,但诊断远非直截了当,往往是在经历错误后才得以明确。为了提高未来的诊断水平,本研究旨在分析我们的误诊情况。对于毛细血管瘤,只有并发症才需要积极治疗,通常病变会自行消退。上睑浸润伴上睑下垂因有导致弱视的风险而需要治疗。我们的病例表明,尝试使用类固醇进行治疗是合理的。眼动脉区域的栓塞相当危险。海绵状血管瘤仅在压迫视神经时才需要治疗,并不一定需要完全切除。淋巴管瘤虽然被归类为良性肿瘤,但只能部分切除,且有损伤眼眶重要结构的风险。其浸润性生长和复发倾向实际上很危险。在不进行活检的情况下诊断肿瘤并尽可能推迟手术治疗非常重要。胚胎性横纹肌肉瘤本身较为罕见,但它是儿童期最常见的原发性恶性肿瘤。即使考虑到熟悉类似创伤、炎症、血管瘤样血管造影的假象病史,诊断往往也较晚。我们的病例证明了这一点,也体现了过去30年治疗方法的变化。不幸的是,必要时化疗联合放疗的良好预后因继发性恶性肿瘤的发生而蒙上阴影。