Haapanen M L
Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Helsinki.
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg Suppl. 1992;26:1-61.
The present study deals with various factors affecting speech, particularly its resonance, in patients with isolated cleft palate. For that purpose a method to evaluate hypernasality was developed. The degree of hypernasality was assessed in terms of hypernasality indexes by means of a modified cul-de-sac hypernasality test. The phonetic content of the test words was chosen so as not to bias the evaluations by compensatory articulations. The reliability and validity of four variations of hypernasality indexes were examined. All these four indexes proved reliable, valid and feasible for evaluating hypernasality. The hypernasality indexes were compared with nasalance scores derived from the Model 6200 Nasometer (The Nasometer 1987, Fletcher et al. 1989). Reference nasalance scores for normal Finnish speech were measured. The mean percent nasalance and the standard deviation were 13 and 8, respectively. In addition to the present hypernasality test modification, more traditional descriptive speech analysis was used in some studies. The effect of the age at primary palatal repair on speech was examined in three year old children with isolated cleft palate. The effect on speech of two techniques for primary palatal repair - a Veau-Wardill-Kilner V to Y push back procedure and the Cronin modification - were compared in young adults with isolated cleft palate. The effect on speech of two techniques for a secondary velopharyngeal flap - a Sanvenero-Rosselli and modified Honig flap - were compared in patients with various ages and cleft types. One third had cleft lip and palate or submucous cleft palate. The rest had isolated cleft palate. The quality of speech was significantly dependent on the age at primary palatal repair. The children, whose palatal repair was performed at the average age of 22 months demonstrated, significantly more frequently, hypernasality and misarticulations related to velopharyngeal insufficiency than the children operated upon earlier. The children operated upon between the average ages of 12-18 months, demonstrated normal speech in about 3/4 of the cases. If the palate was operated on later, about 1/4 of the patients demonstrated normal speech. The technique for primary palatal repair had a significant influence on the quality of speech. Hypernasality assessed in terms of hypernasality indexes was less frequent in the speech of patients with the Cronin modification than with the Veau-Wardill-Kilner push back procedure. The technique for the secondary velopharyngeal flap also affected speech significantly. The patients with a modified Honig velopharyngeal flap eliminated more efficiently hypernasality from their speech than those with a Sanvenero-Rosselli flap.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
本研究探讨了影响孤立性腭裂患者言语的各种因素,尤其是其共鸣。为此,开发了一种评估鼻音过重的方法。通过改良的盲端鼻音过重测试,根据鼻音过重指数评估鼻音过重的程度。选择测试词的语音内容,以免补偿性发音影响评估结果。研究了四种鼻音过重指数变体的可靠性和有效性。所有这四种指数在评估鼻音过重方面均被证明是可靠、有效且可行的。将鼻音过重指数与6200型鼻声计(1987年鼻声计,弗莱彻等人,1989年)得出的鼻声分数进行了比较。测量了芬兰正常语音的参考鼻声分数。平均鼻声百分比和标准差分别为13和8。除了目前对鼻音过重测试的改良外,一些研究还采用了更传统的描述性言语分析。在三岁的孤立性腭裂儿童中,研究了初次腭裂修复年龄对言语的影响。在年轻的孤立性腭裂成年人中,比较了两种初次腭裂修复技术——Veau-Wardill-Kilner V-Y后推手术和克罗宁改良术——对言语的影响。在不同年龄和腭裂类型的患者中,比较了两种二期腭咽瓣技术——Sanvenero-Rosselli瓣和改良Honig瓣——对言语的影响。三分之一的患者患有唇腭裂或黏膜下腭裂。其余患者为孤立性腭裂。言语质量显著取决于初次腭裂修复的年龄。平均在22个月时进行腭裂修复的儿童,与更早接受手术的儿童相比,与腭咽功能不全相关的鼻音过重和发音错误更为频繁。在平均年龄12 - 18个月之间接受手术的儿童,约四分之三的病例表现出正常言语。如果腭裂手术时间较晚,约四分之一的患者表现出正常言语。初次腭裂修复技术对言语质量有显著影响。根据鼻音过重指数评估,采用克罗宁改良术的患者言语中鼻音过重的情况比采用Veau-Wardill-Kilner后推手术的患者少。二期腭咽瓣技术也对言语有显著影响。采用改良Honig腭咽瓣的患者比采用Sanvenero-Rosselli瓣的患者更有效地消除了言语中的鼻音过重。(摘要截选至400字)