• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教师准备:临床专业化对高质量护理教育是一种促进还是阻碍?

Faculty preparation: is clinical specialization a benefit or a deterrent to quality nursing education?

作者信息

Zungolo Eileen

机构信息

Duquesne University School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15282, USA.

出版信息

J Contin Educ Nurs. 2004 Jan-Feb;35(1):19-23. doi: 10.3928/0022-0124-20040101-08.

DOI:10.3928/0022-0124-20040101-08
PMID:14870906
Abstract

This article presents a point of view regarding the impact of specialty preparation at the master's level on performance as a faculty member in an entry-level program. Essentially, the focus in depth on a particular branch of nursing practice restricts the perception of the individual to the role and demands of the beginning generalist nurse. Continued attention to the development of expertise in the specialty reduces the effectiveness of the faculty member to develop a comprehensive view of the knowledge required by the beginning generalist nurse. Because faculty prepared in this manner also frequently lack formal knowledge regarding teaching and curriculum, they continue to teach in the same manner as they were taught, often with an eye toward teaching the extensive content taught in the specialty program. More broadly based master's degree programs that couple advanced nursing knowledge with nursing education content and skill can foster in new nurse faculty a more comprehensive picture of the learning needs of beginning generalist nurses.

摘要

本文提出了一种观点,即硕士阶段的专业培养对初任入门级项目教师的表现所产生的影响。从本质上讲,深入专注于护理实践的特定分支会限制个人对初任通科护士角色和要求的认知。持续关注专业领域专业知识的发展会降低教师培养初任通科护士所需全面知识观的有效性。由于以这种方式培养的教师通常也缺乏关于教学和课程的正规知识,他们继续以自己被教导的方式教学,往往着眼于教授专业项目中所讲授的广泛内容。将高级护理知识与护理教育内容及技能相结合的更具广泛基础的硕士学位项目,可以培养新护士教师对初任通科护士学习需求的更全面认识。

相似文献

1
Faculty preparation: is clinical specialization a benefit or a deterrent to quality nursing education?教师准备:临床专业化对高质量护理教育是一种促进还是阻碍?
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2004 Jan-Feb;35(1):19-23. doi: 10.3928/0022-0124-20040101-08.
2
An analysis of clinical teacher behaviour in a nursing practicum in Taiwan.台湾护理实习中临床教师行为的分析。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 May;15(5):619-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01332.x.
3
Teaching nurses to focus on the health needs of populations: a Master's Degree Program in Population Health Nursing.教导护士关注人群的健康需求:人口健康护理学硕士学位项目
Nurse Educ. 2003 Sep-Oct;28(5):212-6. doi: 10.1097/00006223-200309000-00007.
4
Cultural competence in nursing curricula: how are we doing 20 years later?护理课程中的文化能力:20年后我们做得如何?
J Nurs Educ. 2006 Jul;45(7):243-4. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20060701-01.
5
Nursing education: current themes, puzzles and paradoxes.护理教育:当前的主题、难题与悖论
Commun Nurs Res. 2007 Spring;40:3-14.
6
A model for preparing faculty to teach model C clinical nurse leader students.为教授模式 C 临床护理领导者学生而准备教师的模式。
J Nurs Educ. 2014 Jul 1;53(7):421-5. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20140617-05. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
7
Measuring critical thinking in graduate education: what do we know?研究生教育中的批判性思维测量:我们了解什么?
Nurse Educ. 2006 May-Jun;31(3):132-7. doi: 10.1097/00006223-200605000-00011.
8
Transforming a Curriculum to Progress the Associate Degree Nurse to Advanced Practice.转变课程体系以推动护理学副学士学位护士向高级实践发展。
Nurse Educ. 2015 Sep-Oct;40(5):241-3. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000154.
9
General purposes. Some nurses are calling for a return to a generalist education, with specialisation left until post-registration.总体目标。一些护士呼吁回归通才教育,将专业化留到注册后阶段。
Nurs Stand. 2002;16(33):13.
10
Design and Implementation of an International Nurse Faculty Partnership.国际护士师资伙伴关系的设计与实施
J Prof Nurs. 2016 Mar-Apr;32(2):115-20. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Specialization in psychology and health care reform.心理学专业化与医疗保健改革。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2012 Mar;19(1):12-21. doi: 10.1007/s10880-011-9273-0.