Tegelberg Ake, Walker-Engström Marie-Louise, Vestling Olle, Wilhelmsson Bo
Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Centre for Clinical Research, Uppsala University, Västerås, Sweden.
Acta Odontol Scand. 2003 Dec;61(6):356-62. doi: 10.1080/00016350310007130.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of 2 different degrees of mandibular advancement, 50% vs. 75% of maximum protrusive capacity, on somnographic variables after 1 year of dental appliance treatment in patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A further purpose was to compare the number of adverse events on the stomatognathic system. In a prospective study, 74 male patients were randomly allocated to receive a dental appliance with either 50% (38 patients) or 75% mandibular advancement (36 patients). After 1 year of treatment, 55 patients completed the follow-up. Somnography was performed to measure treatment effects before and 12 months post-treatment. The apnea, apnea/hypopnea, and oxygen desaturation indices decreased significantly in both groups after 1 year (P < 0.001); however, there were no differences between the groups. Normalization (apnea index < 5 and apnea/hypopnea index < 10) was observed in 79% in group 50 and in 73% in group 75. Few patients (< 5%) reported symptoms from the stomatognathic system except for headache (> once a week), which was reported in one-third of the patients. Headache was significantly more infrequent after 1 year of treatment in both groups (P < 0.001). No serious complications were observed except for 2 patients who reported a painful condition from the temporomandibular joint in either group. In conclusion, mandibular advancement with a dental appliance effectively reduces the sleep-breathing disorder measured as frequency of apneas, and a pronounced mandibular advancement did not show a greater improvement of the medical problem compared to less advancement for patients with mild to moderate OSA. On the basis of few adverse events in the stomatognathic system or other complications we can recommend dental appliance treatment and, for patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea, not starting treatment by more than 50% mandibular advancement.
本研究的目的是评估在轻度至中度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者中,经过1年的牙矫治器治疗后,两种不同程度的下颌前伸(最大前伸能力的50%与75%)对睡眠图变量的影响。另一个目的是比较口颌系统不良事件的数量。在一项前瞻性研究中,74名男性患者被随机分配接受下颌前伸50%(38例患者)或75%(36例患者)的牙矫治器。治疗1年后,55例患者完成随访。在治疗前和治疗后12个月进行睡眠图检查以测量治疗效果。1年后两组的呼吸暂停、呼吸暂停/低通气和氧饱和度下降指数均显著降低(P<0.001);然而,两组之间没有差异。50%组79%的患者和75%组73%的患者实现了指标正常化(呼吸暂停指数<5且呼吸暂停/低通气指数<10)。除了头痛(每周发作>1次)外,很少有患者(<5%)报告口颌系统症状,三分之一的患者报告了头痛。两组在治疗1年后头痛发作频率均显著降低(P<0.001)。除两组各有2例患者报告颞下颌关节疼痛外,未观察到严重并发症。总之,对于轻度至中度OSA患者,使用牙矫治器进行下颌前伸可有效减少以呼吸暂停频率衡量的睡眠呼吸障碍,与较小程度的下颌前伸相比,明显更大程度的下颌前伸并未显示出对该医学问题有更大改善。基于口颌系统不良事件或其他并发症较少,我们推荐牙矫治器治疗,对于轻度至中度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者,下颌前伸不超过50%开始治疗。