Gould E W, Robinson P G
Department of Pathology, Baptist Hospital, Miami, FL 33176-2197.
Semin Surg Oncol. 1992 May-Jun;8(3):129-35.
Despite the widespread conservative management of breast cancer, the pathologists' examination of these specimens is far from uniform. Pathologists sample margins differently, and even disagree on what constitutes a positive margin. This variability in the pathologic examination of the lumpectomy creates tremendous problems in analyzing the existing literature on the importance of positive margins. Herein is a discussion of the available data on the significance of margin assessment. We furthermore suggest a practical approach to examining margins with an emphasis on a functional orientation of the specimen with respect to the nipple. Only by adopting a uniform system of margin assessment can we begin to critically evaluate the importance of positive margins in segmental resections of the breast.
尽管乳腺癌的保守治疗广泛应用,但病理学家对这些标本的检查却远未统一。病理学家对切缘的取样方式不同,甚至在何为阳性切缘的问题上也存在分歧。乳房肿瘤切除术病理检查的这种变异性给分析现有文献中关于阳性切缘重要性的内容带来了巨大问题。本文讨论了切缘评估意义的现有数据。我们还建议了一种检查切缘的实用方法,重点是标本相对于乳头的功能方向。只有采用统一的切缘评估系统,我们才能开始严格评估乳房节段性切除术中阳性切缘的重要性。