Ilhami Kuru, Eray Bozan M, Gokhan Maralcan, Ulukan Inan, Levent Altinel
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kocatepe University, Afyon, Turkey.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2004 Feb;19(2):184-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.10.011.
We examined the biomechanical effects of shrinkage in elongated rabbit lateral collateral ligament.
This study was designed in an attempt to evaluate the energy effects of monopolar radiofrequency on strained but not ruptured ligaments.
In treatment of ligament injuries difficulty in reducing increased laxity after trauma and recurrence of instability are important factors for failure.
Ligament elongation and laxity were achieved in operating room by applying varus stress for multiple times. In Group C ( n = 8 ), elongated lateral collateral ligaments were treated only with above-knee cast, while in Group S ( n = 8 ), they were treated with shrinkage and above-knee casts. The un-operated sides were labeled as control groups. At the 12th week after surgery the animals were sacrificed and hind limbs were disarticulated. Removing the other soft tissues around knee, only lateral collateral ligaments were left intact. Biomechanical analyses of the effects of two different treatment methods were compared by performing a pulling-out test.
Considering maximum load and stiffness, conservatively treated ligaments were stronger and stiffer than shrunken ligaments ( P < 0.05 ).
Biomechanical values were altered by both treatment methods. Reflecting an alteration in intra-molecular structure, the main alteration was the decrease of strength in shrunken ligaments. In ligament injuries, we concluded shrinkage not to be superior to conservative treatment.
我们研究了兔外侧副韧带延长后收缩的生物力学效应。
本研究旨在评估单极射频对拉伤但未断裂韧带的能量效应。
在韧带损伤的治疗中,创伤后难以减少增加的松弛度以及不稳定的复发是治疗失败的重要因素。
在手术室通过多次施加内翻应力实现韧带延长和松弛。C组(n = 8)中,延长的外侧副韧带仅用膝上石膏治疗,而S组(n = 8)中,它们接受收缩治疗并使用膝上石膏。未手术侧标记为对照组。术后第12周处死动物,分离后肢。去除膝关节周围的其他软组织,仅保留外侧副韧带完整。通过进行拔出试验比较两种不同治疗方法效果的生物力学分析。
考虑到最大负荷和刚度,保守治疗的韧带比收缩治疗的韧带更强更硬(P < 0.05)。
两种治疗方法均改变了生物力学值。反映分子内结构的改变,主要改变是收缩治疗的韧带强度降低。在韧带损伤中,我们得出结论,收缩治疗并不优于保守治疗。