Suppr超能文献

脊髓小脑共济失调中的周围神经受累

Peripheral nerve involvement in spinocerebellar ataxias.

作者信息

van de Warrenburg Bart P C, Notermans Nicolette C, Schelhaas Helenius J, van Alfen Nens, Sinke Richard J, Knoers Nine V A M, Zwarts Machiel J, Kremer Berry P H

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Arch Neurol. 2004 Feb;61(2):257-61. doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.2.257.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias (ADCAs), it is unclear whether the associated peripheral nerve involvement is always a typical length-dependent axonopathy rather than primary neuronopathy due to neuronal degeneration in the spinal anterior horns and/or dorsal root ganglia.

OBJECTIVE

To study the nature and extent of peripheral nerve involvement in patients with ADCA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Standardized clinical and electrophysiologic studies of 27 genotyped patients with ADCA were conducted prospectively, with special emphasis on the distinction between primary neuronopathy and dying-back axonopathy.

RESULTS

Electrophysiologic evidence of involvement of the peripheral nervous system was present in 70% of patients. Findings were compatible with dying-back axonopathy in 30%, while in 40% of patients, neuronopathy was diagnosed. Patients with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) 1 and SCA2 mostly displayed features of neuronopathy, while patients with SCA3 and SCA7 displayed both neuronopathy and axonopathy. In SCA6, no significant peripheral nerve involvement was demonstrated. We did not observe an influence of age, disease duration, or ataxia severity on the presence or type of peripheral nerve involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral nerve involvement in ADCA manifests not only as distal axonal neuropathy, but also as primary neuronopathy. Electrodiagnostic studies in this group of patients should be conducted in such a way that primary neuronopathy is detected.

摘要

背景

在常染色体显性遗传性小脑共济失调(ADCA)中,尚不清楚相关的周围神经受累是否总是典型的长度依赖性轴索性神经病,而非由于脊髓前角和/或背根神经节神经元变性所致的原发性神经元病。

目的

研究ADCA患者周围神经受累的性质和程度。

患者和方法

对27例已进行基因分型的ADCA患者进行了前瞻性标准化临床和电生理研究,特别着重于原发性神经元病和轴索变性型神经病之间的鉴别。

结果

70%的患者存在周围神经系统受累的电生理证据。30%的患者结果符合轴索变性型神经病,而40%的患者被诊断为神经元病。脊髓小脑共济失调(SCA)1型和SCA2型患者大多表现为神经元病特征,而SCA3型和SCA7型患者同时表现出神经元病和轴索性神经病。在SCA6型中,未显示有明显的周围神经受累。我们未观察到年龄、病程或共济失调严重程度对周围神经受累的存在或类型有影响。

结论

ADCA患者的周围神经受累不仅表现为远端轴索性神经病,还表现为原发性神经元病。对这组患者进行电诊断研究时,应以能够检测出原发性神经元病的方式进行。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验