Gentry Terry J, Josephson Karen L, Pepper Ian L
University of Arizona, Department of Soil, Water, and Environmental Science, 429 Shantz Building, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Biodegradation. 2004 Feb;15(1):67-75. doi: 10.1023/b:biod.0000009974.13147.82.
Introduced degraders often do not survive when applied to polluted sites; however, the potential for successful bioaugmentation may be increased if newly activated soil (containing indigenous degrader populations recently exposed to the contaminant) or potentially active soil (containing indigenous degrader populations not previously exposed to the contaminant) is used as the inoculant. To investigate this concept, Madera and Oversite soils were amended with 0 or 500 micrograms of 2-, 3-, or 4-chlorobenzoate per gram soil. The Madera degraded 2-chlorobenzoate while the Oversite degraded 3- and 4-chlorobenzoate. After 22 days of incubation, non-active soils that had not degraded chlorobenzoate were bioaugmented with the appropriate activated soil that had been exposed to and degraded chlorobenzoate. Thus, Oversite soil that had not degraded 2-chlorobenzoate was bioaugmented with Madera soil that had degraded 2-chlorobenzoate. Likewise, Madera soil that had not degraded 3- or 4-chlorobenzoate was bioaugmented with the Oversite soil that had degraded 3- or 4-chlorobenzoate. Additionally, the non-active soils were bioaugmented with the corresponding potentially active soils. The Oversite soil amended with activated Madera soil degraded the 2-chlorobenzoate within 3 days of bioaugmentation. The Madera soil amended with activated Oversite soils degraded the 3- and 4-chlorobenzoate within 20 and 6 days, respectively. Large degrader populations developed in microcosms bioaugmented with activated soil, and shifts in the 3- and 4-CB degrader community structures occurred following bioaugmentation. In contrast, bioaugmentation with potentially active soil did not impact degradation. The results indicate the potential for bioaugmentation with newly activated soil to enhance contaminant degradation.
引入的降解菌在应用于污染场地时往往无法存活;然而,如果将新活化的土壤(含有最近接触过污染物的本地降解菌种群)或潜在活性土壤(含有以前未接触过污染物的本地降解菌种群)用作接种物,成功进行生物强化的可能性可能会增加。为了研究这一概念,向马德拉土壤和奥弗赛特土壤中分别添加了每克土壤0或500微克的2-、3-或4-氯苯甲酸。马德拉土壤能降解2-氯苯甲酸,而奥弗赛特土壤能降解3-和4-氯苯甲酸。培养22天后,未降解氯苯甲酸的非活性土壤用已接触并降解氯苯甲酸的相应活化土壤进行生物强化。因此,未降解2-氯苯甲酸的奥弗赛特土壤用已降解2-氯苯甲酸的马德拉土壤进行生物强化。同样,未降解3-或4-氯苯甲酸的马德拉土壤用已降解3-或4-氯苯甲酸的奥弗赛特土壤进行生物强化。此外,非活性土壤还用相应的潜在活性土壤进行生物强化。用活化的马德拉土壤改良的奥弗赛特土壤在生物强化后3天内降解了2-氯苯甲酸。用活化的奥弗赛特土壤改良的马德拉土壤分别在20天和6天内降解了3-和4-氯苯甲酸。在用活化土壤进行生物强化的微宇宙中形成了大量的降解菌种群,生物强化后3-和4-氯苯甲酸降解菌群落结构发生了变化。相比之下,用潜在活性土壤进行生物强化对降解没有影响。结果表明,用新活化的土壤进行生物强化有增强污染物降解作用的潜力。