Collewet G, Strzelecki M, Mariette F
Cemagref, Rennes, France.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Jan;22(1):81-91. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2003.09.001.
Texture analysis methods quantify the spatial variations in gray level values within an image and thus can provide useful information on the structures observed. However, they are sensitive to acquisition conditions due to the use of different protocols and to intra- and interscanner variations in the case of MRI. The influence was studied of two protocols and four different conditions of normalization of gray levels on the discrimination power of texture analysis methods applied to soft cheeses. Thirty-two samples of soft cheese were chosen at two different ripening periods (16 young and 16 old samples) in order to obtain two different microscopic structures of the protein gel. Proton density and T(2)-weighted MR images were acquired using a spin echo sequence on a 0.2 T scanner. Gray levels were normalized according to four methods: original gray levels, same maximum for all images, same mean for all images, and dynamics limited to micro +/- 3sigma. Regions of interest were automatically defined, and texture descriptors were then computed for the co-occurrence matrix, run length matrix, gradient matrix, autoregressive model, and wavelet transform. The features with the lowest probability of error and average correlation coefficient were selected and used for classification with 1-nearest neighbor (1-NN) classifier. The best results were obtained when using the limitation of dynamics to micro +/- 3sigma, which enhanced the differences between the two classes. The results demonstrated the influence of the normalization method and of the acquisition protocol on the effectiveness of the classification and also on the parameters selected for classification. These results indicate the need to evaluate sensitivity to MR acquisition protocols and to gray level normalization methods when texture analysis is required.
纹理分析方法可量化图像中灰度值的空间变化,从而能够提供有关所观察结构的有用信息。然而,由于使用了不同的协议,以及在磁共振成像(MRI)情况下扫描仪内部和之间的变化,这些方法对采集条件很敏感。研究了两种协议以及灰度的四种不同归一化条件对应用于软奶酪的纹理分析方法的辨别力的影响。选择了32个软奶酪样品,处于两个不同的成熟阶段(16个年轻样品和16个成熟样品),以获得蛋白质凝胶的两种不同微观结构。使用0.2T扫描仪上的自旋回波序列采集质子密度和T(2)加权磁共振图像。灰度根据四种方法进行归一化:原始灰度、所有图像具有相同的最大值、所有图像具有相同的平均值以及动态范围限制在微 +/- 3σ。自动定义感兴趣区域,然后针对共生矩阵、游程矩阵、梯度矩阵、自回归模型和小波变换计算纹理描述符。选择错误概率最低和平均相关系数的特征,并用于1-最近邻(1-NN)分类器进行分类。当使用动态范围限制在微 +/- 3σ时获得了最佳结果,这增强了两类之间的差异。结果证明了归一化方法和采集协议对分类有效性以及对用于分类的参数方面的影响。这些结果表明,在需要进行纹理分析时,有必要评估对磁共振采集协议和灰度归一化方法的敏感性。