Kravchick Sergey, Cytron Shmuel, Peled Ronit, London Daniel, Sibi Yosef, Ben-Dor David
Department of Urology, Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon, Israel.
Urology. 2004 Feb;63(2):301-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.034.
To determine the accuracy of different combinations of biopsies in detecting prostate cancer. The standard sextant protocol for obtaining prostate biopsy underestimates the presence of prostate cancer. Conversely, an increased cancer detection rate has been obtained with additional laterally directed biopsies. The results of the studies dedicated to transrectal color Doppler (CD) sonography have shown that it might detect neoplastic lesions with no corresponding gray-scale abnormality.
A total of 120 consecutive patients underwent sextant biopsy with additional biopsy cores taken from the lateral peripheral zone (four to six cores, depending on the prostate volume) and CD-guided biopsy. The sensitivity of laterally directed, CD-guided, and different combinations of biopsies was compared. Various patient, clinical, and pathologic factors were compared, and multivariate analysis was performed to assess the strongest predictor of cancer detection.
Cancer was detected in 43 (35.8%) of 120 patients. The combination of sextant biopsy with laterally directed cores gained sensitivity to 56.6% compared with 67.4% obtained in the regimen that combined sextant and CD-guided biopsy. The CD regimen detected cancer in 11 additional patients. However, the differences in the detection rates of these combinations were not statistically significant (P = 0.797). The results of multivariate analysis showed that sextant biopsy and laterally directed cores were the strongest predictors of cancer detection (odds ratio 8.356 versus 49.282; 95% confidence interval 1.698 to 41.114 versus 10.508 to 231.130).
The regimen that included sextant and CD-guided biopsy was the most sensitive. However, only standard sextant and laterally directed biopsies were statistically significant predictors of cancer detection on biopsy.
确定不同活检组合在检测前列腺癌方面的准确性。获取前列腺活检的标准六分区方案会低估前列腺癌的存在。相反,增加侧向活检可提高癌症检出率。经直肠彩色多普勒(CD)超声检查的相关研究结果表明,它可能检测到无相应灰阶异常的肿瘤性病变。
连续120例患者接受六分区活检,并从外周带外侧取额外的活检组织(4至6条组织,取决于前列腺体积)以及CD引导下的活检。比较侧向活检、CD引导活检以及不同活检组合的敏感性。比较各种患者、临床和病理因素,并进行多变量分析以评估癌症检测的最强预测因素。
120例患者中有43例(35.8%)检测到癌症。六分区活检与侧向活检组织相结合的方案使敏感性提高到56.6%,而六分区活检与CD引导活检相结合的方案敏感性为67.4%。CD引导活检方案又多检测出11例癌症患者。然而,这些组合的检出率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.797)。多变量分析结果显示,六分区活检和侧向活检组织是癌症检测的最强预测因素(优势比分别为8.356和49.282;95%置信区间分别为1.698至41.114和10.508至231.130)。
六分区活检与CD引导活检相结合的方案最为敏感。然而,在活检时,只有标准六分区活检和侧向活检是癌症检测的统计学显著预测因素。