Ryan Michael G.
USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 240 West Prospect Road, Fort Collins, CO 80526-2098, USA.
Tree Physiol. 1991 Jul-Sep;9(1_2):255-266. doi: 10.1093/treephys/9.1-2.255.
Gross carbon budgets for vegetation in forest ecosystems are difficult to construct because of problems in scaling flux measurements made on small samples over short periods of time and in determining belowground carbon allocation. Recently, empirical relationships have been developed to estimate total belowground carbon allocation from litterfall, and maintenance respiration from tissue nitrogen content. I outline a method for estimating gross carbon budgets using these empirical relationships together with data readily available from ecosystem studies (aboveground wood and canopy production, aboveground wood and canopy biomass, litterfall, and tissue nitrogen contents). Estimates generated with this method are compared with annual carbon fixation estimates from the Forest-BGC model for a lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl.) and a Pacific silver fir (Abies amabilis Dougl.) chronosequence.
由于在将短时间内对小样本进行的通量测量进行尺度扩展以及确定地下碳分配方面存在问题,森林生态系统中植被的总碳预算很难构建。最近,已经建立了经验关系来从凋落物估算地下总碳分配,并从组织氮含量估算维持呼吸。我概述了一种使用这些经验关系以及生态系统研究中容易获得的数据(地上木材和冠层产量、地上木材和冠层生物量、凋落物以及组织氮含量)来估算总碳预算的方法。将用这种方法生成的估算值与森林生物地球化学循环(Forest - BGC)模型对扭叶松(Pinus contorta Dougl.)和太平洋银枞(Abies amabilis Dougl.)时间序列的年碳固定估算值进行比较。