Ohlsson A, Lacy J B
Department of Paediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD001239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001239.pub2.
BACKGROUND: Congenital and nosocomial infections are important causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Maternal transport of immunoglobulins to the fetus mainly occurs after 32 weeks gestation and endogenous synthesis does not begin until several months after birth. Administration of intravenous immunoglobulin provides IgG that can bind to cell surface receptors, provide opsonic activity, activate complement, promote antibody dependent cytotoxicity, and improve neutrophilic chemo luminescence. Theoretically infectious morbidity and morbidity could be reduced by the administration of intravenous immunoglobulin. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) to reduce mortality/morbidity caused by suspected infection in newborn infants. In secondary analyses to assess the effectiveness of IVIG to reduce mortality/morbidity in those neonates who entered into the studies with suspected infection and who later were confirmed as being infected. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched in September 2003. The reference lists of identified RCTs, meta-analyses and personal files were searched. No language restrictions were applied. Unpublished information was requested from and obtained from five researchers (Erdem 1993; Gokalp 1994; Haque 1988; Mancilla-R 1992; Shenoi 1999). For this update no new trials were identified but additional information on one trial (Mancilla-R 1992) was obtained in February 2002. SELECTION CRITERIA: The criteria used to select studies for inclusion were: 1) DESIGN: RCT (including quasi-randomized trials) 2) Newborn infants (< 28 days old)3) INTERVENTION: IVIG for treatment of suspected (and in some infants subsequently proved) bacterial/fungal infection compared to placebo or no intervention. 4) At least one of the following outcomes was reported: mortality during initial hospital stay; length of hospital stay; side effects; psychomotor development/growth at follow up. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently abstracted information for the outcomes of interest and one researcher (AO) checked for any discrepancies and pooled the results. Typical Relative Risk (RR) and Risk Difference (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the fixed effects model are reported for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous data. NNT were to be calculated for outcomes that showed a statistically significant reduction in RD. For this update we did not calculate the RD and the NNT for the subset of patients, who entered the trials with suspected sepsis and who were subsequently proven to have sepsis. Such estimates are meaningless as the clinician is unaware at the point of starting treatment, whether the infant will have proven sepsis or not. For this update we added the I(2) statistic. MAIN RESULTS: Five hundred fifty three neonates with suspected infection have been enrolled in RCTs to evaluate the effect of IVIG on neonatal outcomes. These studies were undertaken in seven countries. Six studies (n = 318) reported on the outcome of mortality for randomized patients with clinically suspected infection. The results showed a reduction in mortality following IVIG treatment [typical RR 0.63 (95% CI; 0.40, 1.00), RD -0.09 (95% CI; 0.00, -0.17) of borderline statistical significance. Treatment with IVIG (seven trials, n = 262) in cases of subsequently proven infection did result in a statistically significant reduction in mortality [typical RR 0.55 (95% CI; 0.31, 0.98)In spite of different geographical locations of the studies, differences in the mortality in the control groups (range 0% - 43.8%), the use of different IVIG preparations, and different dosing regimens, there was no statistically significant between-study heterogeneity for the outcome of mortality in the two analyses. I(2 )= 0%. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The conclusions did not change in this updated review. There is insufficient evidence to support the routine administration of IVIG preparations investigated to date to prevent mortality in infants with gated to date to prevent mortality in infants with suspected or subsequently proved neonatal infection. Researchers should be encouraged to undertake well-designed trials to confirm or refute the effectiveness of IVIG to reduce adverse outcomes in neonates with suspected infection. Such a trial is currently ongoing in the UK and Australia (Brocklehurst 2001). The sample size is 5000 neonates and as of September 2003 more than 600 patients have been enrolled.
背景:先天性感染和医院感染是新生儿发病和死亡的重要原因。母体免疫球蛋白向胎儿的转运主要发生在妊娠32周后,内源性合成直到出生后几个月才开始。静脉注射免疫球蛋白可提供能与细胞表面受体结合的IgG,具有调理活性,激活补体,促进抗体依赖性细胞毒性,并改善中性粒细胞化学发光。理论上,静脉注射免疫球蛋白可降低感染性发病率。 目的:评估静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)降低新生儿疑似感染所致死亡率/发病率的有效性。在二次分析中,评估IVIG对那些入组时疑似感染且后来被证实感染的新生儿降低死亡率/发病率的有效性。 检索策略:2003年9月检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆。检索了已识别的随机对照试验、荟萃分析的参考文献列表和个人文件。未设语言限制。向五位研究人员(Erdem 1993;Gokalp 1994;Haque 1988;Mancilla-R 1992;Shenoi 1999)索取并获得了未发表的信息。本次更新未识别到新的试验,但在2002年2月获得了关于一项试验(Mancilla-R 1992)的更多信息。 入选标准:用于选择纳入研究的标准为:1)设计:随机对照试验(包括半随机试验)2)新生儿(<28日龄)3)干预措施:与安慰剂或无干预相比,IVIG用于治疗疑似(部分婴儿随后被证实)细菌/真菌感染。4)至少报告以下一项结果:初次住院期间的死亡率;住院时间;副作用;随访时的精神运动发育/生长情况。 数据收集与分析:两位评审员独立提取感兴趣的结果信息,一位研究人员(AO)检查是否存在差异并汇总结果。二分结果报告典型相对风险(RR)和风险差异(RD)及95%置信区间(CI),使用固定效应模型,连续数据报告加权平均差(WMD)。对于显示RD有统计学显著降低的结果计算需治疗人数(NNT)。本次更新中,我们未计算入组时疑似败血症且后来被证实患有败血症的患者亚组的RD和NNT。由于临床医生在开始治疗时不知道婴儿是否会被证实患有败血症,此类估计毫无意义。本次更新中我们增加了I(2)统计量。 主要结果:553例疑似感染的新生儿被纳入随机对照试验以评估IVIG对新生儿结局的影响。这些研究在7个国家开展。6项研究(n = 318)报告了临床疑似感染的随机患者的死亡率结果。结果显示IVIG治疗后死亡率降低[典型RR 0.63(95%CI:0.40,1.00),RD -0.09(95%CI:0.00,-0.17),具有临界统计学意义。在随后被证实感染的病例中使用IVIG治疗(7项试验,n = 262)确实导致死亡率有统计学显著降低[典型RR 0.55(95%CI:0.31,0.98)]。尽管研究地点不同,对照组死亡率不同(范围0% - 43.8%),使用不同的IVIG制剂和不同的给药方案,但在两项分析中死亡率结果的研究间无统计学显著异质性。I(2)=0%。 评审员结论:本次更新综述的结论未改变。尚无足够证据支持常规使用迄今所研究的IVIG制剂预防疑似或随后被证实患有新生儿感染的婴儿的死亡。应鼓励研究人员开展设计良好的试验以证实或反驳IVIG降低疑似感染新生儿不良结局的有效性。英国和澳大利亚目前正在进行这样一项试验(Brocklehurst 2001)。样本量为5000例新生儿,截至2003年9月已入组600多名患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006-7-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-29
Australas Med J. 2014-7-31
Paediatr Drugs. 2014-2
Transfus Med Hemother. 2009
Adv Pediatr. 2010
Paediatr Drugs. 2010-10-1
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010-2-23
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010-3-5