Hambrecht E, Eissen J J, de Klein W J H, Ducro B J, Smits C H M, Verstegen M W A, den Hartog L A
Nutreco Swine Research Centre, Boxmeer, The Netherlands.
J Anim Sci. 2004 Feb;82(2):551-6. doi: 10.2527/2004.822551x.
The present experiment investigated whether increasing chilling rate could improve meat quality in pigs exposed to either minimal or high stress immediately preslaughter. Pigs (n = 192) were offspring of halothane-free lines. On various days, four groups of 48 pigs were processed at a commercial plant. Within each group, half the pigs were exposed to either minimal or high preslaughter stress. Before entering the cooler at 45 min postmortem, carcasses of both minimal and high preslaughter stress treatments were allocated randomly to either conventional (+4 degrees C for 22 h) or rapid (three-phase chilling tunnel: -15, -10, and -1 degrees C for 15, 38, and 38 min, respectively, followed by storage at 4 degrees C until 22 h postmortem) chilling. Temperature and pH were measured in the blood at exsanguination and in the longissimus lumborum (LL) and semimembranosus (SM) muscle at 0.5, 2.5, 4.5, 6.5, and 22 h postmortem. Meat quality attributes (water-holding capacity and objective color measurements) were assessed on the LL. Preslaughter stress level affected pH and temperature in both blood and muscle, with lower (P < 0.001) pH values and higher (P < 0.001) temperatures for pigs exposed to high vs. minimal stress. Rapid chilling led to a faster (P < 0.001) temperature decline regardless of preslaughter stress level. Rapid chilling did not (P > 0.05) influence the rate of pH decline in the LL muscle, but reduced (P = 0.061) pH decline in the SM. Rapid chilling, as opposed to conventional chilling, decreased (P < 0.05) electrical conductivity in the LL, regardless of preslaughter stress; however, it could not compensate for the detrimental effect (P < 0.05) of stress on drip loss, filter paper moisture absorption, and meat color (L* value). Results from the present study indicated that increasing chilling rate is not a suitable method to resolve pork quality problems caused by inadequate preslaughter handling.
本实验研究了提高冷却速度是否能改善在屠宰前即刻受到最小应激或高应激的猪的肉质。猪(n = 192)为无氟烷品系的后代。在不同日期,四组每组48头猪在一家商业屠宰场进行处理。在每组中,一半的猪受到最小或高屠宰前应激。在宰后45分钟进入冷却器之前,最小和高屠宰前应激处理的胴体被随机分配到常规冷却(4℃ 22小时)或快速冷却(三相冷却隧道:分别在-15℃、-10℃和-1℃下冷却15、38和38分钟,然后在4℃下储存直至宰后22小时)。在放血时测量血液中的温度和pH值,并在宰后0.5、2.5、4.5、6.5和22小时测量腰大肌(LL)和半膜肌(SM)中的温度和pH值。在LL上评估肉质属性(持水能力和客观颜色测量)。屠宰前应激水平影响血液和肌肉中的pH值和温度,与最小应激的猪相比,受到高应激的猪的pH值较低(P < 0.001),温度较高(P < 0.001)。无论屠宰前应激水平如何,快速冷却导致温度下降更快(P < 0.001)。快速冷却对LL肌肉中pH值下降速率没有影响(P > 0.05),但降低了SM中pH值的下降(P = 0.061)。与常规冷却相反,快速冷却降低了LL中的电导率(P < 0.05),无论屠宰前应激如何;然而,它无法弥补应激对滴水损失、滤纸吸湿和肉色(L*值)的不利影响(P < 0.05)。本研究结果表明,提高冷却速度不是解决因屠宰前处理不当导致的猪肉质量问题的合适方法。