Wheeler T L, Shackelford S D, Koohmaraie M
Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, ARS, USDA, Clay Center, NE 68933-0166, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2004 Feb;82(2):557-62. doi: 10.2527/2004.822557x.
The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy and repeatability of untrained laboratory consumer panelists in detecting differences in beef longissimus tenderness. At 14 d postmortem, slice shear force was measured on one steak from 192 strip loins and used to select 54 strip loins and assign 18 of the strip loins to each of three tenderness classes (tender = < 15 kg, intermediate = 15 to 27 kg, and tough = > 27 kg). Sixty-eight untrained, laboratory consumer panelists evaluated paired steaks from each tenderness class in each of two sessions (12 total observations per panelist). Mean slice shear forces for "tender," "intermediate," and "tough" were 11.1, 21.0, and 32.2 kg, respectively. Mean tenderness ratings of the untrained laboratory consumer panel were different (P < 0.05) among tenderness classes (mean of 16 panelists = 6.2, 4.9, and 3.3 for tender, intermediate, and tough, respectively), and these differences were similar regardless of how many untrained panelists were averaged to determine the panel mean (4, 8, 12, or 16). The correlations (P < 0.01) between slice shear force and the mean untrained consumer panel tenderness rating (mean of 4, r = -0.82; mean of 8, r = -0.89; mean of 12, r = -0.91; and mean of 16, r = -0.92;) were similar. Overall repeatability of the untrained consumer panel was 0.80. Repeatability of individual untrained consumer panelists for tenderness rating was highly variable: 31% were > 0.80, 36% were 0.60 to 0.79, and 33% were < 0.60. Thirty-two percent of the consumers were both accurate (correlation to slice shear force = -0.75 to -1.00, P < 0.01) and repeatable (repeatability > 0.75). There is wide variability in the ability of untrained laboratory consumer panelists to detect differences in beef tenderness. Nonetheless, untrained consumer panels can accurately and repeatedly detect differences in beef tenderness under controlled laboratory conditions. An untrained laboratory consumer panel may be able to provide as effective an evaluation of beef longissimus tenderness as a trained descriptive attribute panel.
本研究的目的是确定未经训练的实验室消费者小组成员检测牛肉腰大肌嫩度差异的准确性和重复性。宰后14天,对192块里脊的一块牛排进行切片剪切力测量,并据此选择54块里脊,将其中18块里脊分配到三个嫩度等级中的每一个等级(嫩度等级为<15千克、中等为15至27千克、老韧为>27千克)。68名未经训练的实验室消费者小组成员在两个阶段中对每个嫩度等级中的配对牛排进行评估(每位小组成员共进行12次观察)。“嫩”“中等”和“老韧”的平均切片剪切力分别为11.1千克、21.0千克和32.2千克。未经训练的实验室消费者小组的平均嫩度评分在不同嫩度等级之间存在差异(P<0.05)(16位小组成员的平均值分别为:嫩度等级为6.2、中等为4.9、老韧为3.3),且无论平均多少位未经训练的小组成员来确定小组平均值(4、8、12或16),这些差异都是相似的。切片剪切力与未经训练的消费者小组平均嫩度评分之间存在相关性(P<0.01)(4位小组成员的平均值r=-0.82;8位小组成员的平均值r=-0.89;12位小组成员的平均值r=-0.91;16位小组成员的平均值r=-0.92),且这些相关性相似。未经训练的消费者小组的总体重复性为0.80。个体未经训练的消费者小组成员嫩度评分重复性变化很大:31%大于0.80,36%为0.60至0.79,33%小于0.60。32%的消费者既准确(与切片剪切力相关性=-0.75至-1.00,P<0.01)又具有重复性(重复性>0.75)。未经训练的实验室消费者小组成员检测牛肉嫩度差异的能力存在很大差异。尽管如此,在受控实验室条件下,未经训练的消费者小组能够准确且重复地检测出牛肉嫩度的差异。一个未经训练的实验室消费者小组可能能够像经过训练的描述性属性小组一样有效地评估牛肉腰大肌的嫩度。