Beard Stephen M, Wall Lucy, Gaffney Louise, Sampson Fiona
RTI Health Solutions, Manchester, UK.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(4):207-24. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422040-00001.
High-intermediate grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is an aggressive form of the disease, which can respond well to combination chemotherapy, with long-term survival seen in 40-50% of patients. When NHL relapses following standard treatment, high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow support may still cure a significant proportion of patients. Despite a significant rise in the incidence of NHL over recent years, there remains only limited published economic study concerning the overall lifetime cost of treatment, the cost effectiveness of specific treatments or the overall societal cost burden of the disease. The majority of studies identified for the purposes of this review considered the cost of alternative forms of chemotherapy and bone marrow support strategies for patients with advanced disease. Data from these studies suggest that there is a definite trend towards reduced costs for high-dose therapy, possibly reflecting increasing technical experience and improved bone marrow recovery through the use of stem cell transplantation and growth factors. The limited number of cost-effectiveness evaluations suggest that high-dose therapy, following a chemosensitive relapse, is likely to be considered favourable against commonly quoted cost-effectiveness thresholds. Cost effectiveness is becoming an increasingly important factor to consider in the formal assessment of new interventions conducted by groups such as the UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence. In light of the increasing incidence of NHL and the extended use of high-dose treatments in other subgroups of patients, there is a need for increased research into the economics of new interventions for NHL.
高中间级非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)是一种侵袭性疾病,对联合化疗反应良好,40%-50%的患者可长期存活。当NHL在标准治疗后复发时,采用外周血干细胞或骨髓支持的大剂量化疗仍可治愈相当一部分患者。尽管近年来NHL的发病率显著上升,但关于治疗的终身总成本、特定治疗的成本效益或该疾病的总体社会成本负担的已发表经济研究仍然有限。为本综述目的所确定的大多数研究考虑了晚期疾病患者替代化疗形式和骨髓支持策略的成本。这些研究的数据表明,大剂量治疗成本有明确的降低趋势,这可能反映了技术经验的增加以及通过使用干细胞移植和生长因子改善了骨髓恢复情况。有限的成本效益评估表明,在化疗敏感复发后进行大剂量治疗,相对于通常引用的成本效益阈值,可能被认为是有利的。成本效益在诸如英国国家临床优化研究所等机构对新干预措施的正式评估中已成为一个越来越重要的考虑因素。鉴于NHL发病率的上升以及大剂量治疗在其他患者亚组中的广泛应用,有必要加强对NHL新干预措施经济学的研究。