Mackenzie Charles D, Geary Timothy G, Gerlach John A
Filarial Diseases Unit, Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA and Biological Imaging Center, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Mi 49008, USA.
Filaria J. 2003 Oct 24;2 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. doi: 10.1186/1475-2883-2-S1-S5.
Reactions are commonly associated with the chemotherapy of onchocerciasis. However unmanageable reactions are uncommon when ivermectin (Mectizan(R)) is used for the treatment of this infection, and this drug has proved to be a great improvement over previously used agents. Serious adverse events (SAE) nevertheless have occurred, and there is considerable concern about the negative effect such events may have on mass drug administration programs.This paper reviews the basic pathogenic mechanisms that can be involved in the destruction of microfilaria by chemotherapeutic agents. A central challenge to filarial chemotherapy is the need to remove parasites from biologically sensitive tissues, a more difficult medical challenge than eliminating nematodes from the gastrointestinal tract.Explanations for the etiology of the serious adverse reactions occurring with ivermectin treatment in specific geographic areas where there is coincident heavy Loa loa infections are hampered by a lack of specific pathological case material. Ways to investigate these possibilities are reviewed. Possible pathogenic mechanisms include embolic vascular pathology accompanied by local inflammation, blood brain barrier mdr1 abnormalities, and genetic predisposition to excessive inflammatory responses. CONCLUSION: It is important to keep ivermectin, and all its associated adverse clinical events, in perspective with the many other chemotherapeutic agents in general use - many of which produce serious adverse events even more frequently than does ivermectin. Currently available evidence indicates that the pathogenesis of the Loa-associated adverse reactions are probably related to inflammatory responses to microfilariae in specific tissues. However, the possibility of genetic predispositions to pathology should also be considered.
反应通常与盘尾丝虫病的化疗相关。然而,当使用伊维菌素(美迪善®)治疗这种感染时,难以控制的反应并不常见,并且这种药物已被证明比以前使用的药物有了很大改进。尽管如此,严重不良事件(SAE)仍有发生,人们相当关注此类事件可能对大规模药物给药计划产生的负面影响。本文回顾了化疗药物破坏微丝蚴可能涉及的基本致病机制。丝虫化疗面临的一个核心挑战是需要从生物敏感组织中清除寄生虫,这比从胃肠道清除线虫更具医学挑战性。在同时存在重度罗阿丝虫感染的特定地理区域,伊维菌素治疗出现严重不良反应的病因解释因缺乏具体的病理病例材料而受阻。本文回顾了研究这些可能性的方法。可能的致病机制包括伴有局部炎症的栓塞性血管病变、血脑屏障mdr1异常以及对过度炎症反应的遗传易感性。结论:重要的是要从整体上看待伊维菌素及其所有相关的不良临床事件,与许多其他常用的化疗药物相比——其中许多药物产生严重不良事件的频率甚至比伊维菌素更高。目前可得的证据表明,与罗阿丝虫相关的不良反应的发病机制可能与特定组织中对微丝蚴的炎症反应有关。然而,也应考虑病理遗传易感性的可能性。