Le Houezec J, Säwe U
Pharmacia, R & D Consumer Healthcare, Helsingborg, Suède.
J Mal Vasc. 2003 Dec;28(5):293-300.
Tobacco use causes enormous morbidity and mortality because of the high risk of smoking-related diseases and the high prevalence of cigarette smoking. Existing smoking cessation methods only help motivated smokers who are ready to quit, but the vast majority of smokers are pre-contemplators who are neither ready nor willing to attempt to quit. This means that a high proportion of smokers are not adequately served by current strategies for treating tobacco dependence. As cigarettes prematurely kill 50% of long-term users, any additional measure that may reduce death or illness should be given serious consideration. Many addicted smokers are now forced to live and work much of their life in environments in which smoking is prohibited. Most smokers are dependent on nicotine and abstinence from smoking results in tobacco withdrawal and craving, which manifest as clinical symptoms within a few hours of smoking the last cigarette. Craving and withdrawal symptoms can be controlled by supplying nicotine from sources other than cigarettes, such as Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT). Clinical studies of short-term abstinence show that all NRT formulations relieve tobacco withdrawal symptoms and craving. Most unaided attempts to decrease health risks by reducing smoking fail because smokers revert to their 'usual' nicotine intake. However, using NRT to reduce smoking allows smokers to reduce their cigarette consumption (and intake of toxic substances in smoke) while maintaining their nicotine dose. Data suggest that smokers who use NRT can significantly reduce the withdrawal symptoms and craving caused by abstaining from cigarettes, and thereby reduce the number of cigarettes/day and maintain these reductions for up to 2 years. The data also indicate that, despite some compensatory smoking behaviour, reduced smoking with NRT results in decreased toxin exposure. In smoking reduction studies, this translated into an improvement in variables that impact on health: cardiovascular risk factors and haemorheology parameters moved towards more healthy (i.e. non-smoker) levels, and pulmonary function improved. The improvements in established cardiovascular risk factors provide objective proof that exposure reduction translates into clinically meaningful health benefits. Furthermore, the known reversibility of many smoking-induced diseases, the mainly linear dose-effect curve and the absence of any indication of threshold effects suggest that additional health benefits may result from smoking reduction. Even more importantly, smoking reduction may move smokers along the behavioural model towards the ultimate goal--stopping smoking. In all three large smoking reduction studies, a number of subjects who were unwilling or unable to stop smoking at baseline were abstinent at 4 months and 1 and 2 years, which clearly supports the concept of smoking reduction as a step towards abstinence. Rather than undermining cessation, smoking reduction appears to increase motivation to quit. The importance of allowing smokers to gradually take control of their smoking was reflected by the increasing point prevalence abstinence rates seen in the long-term studies. When encouraging smoking reduction, it should clearly be emphasised that complete cessation remains the ultimate goal, but smokers in the precontemplation stage need to progress along the behavioural model before becoming receptive to messages about quitting. In conclusion, the evidence presented in this review supports reduced smoking as a legitimate treatment approach that could be pursued by those smokers who are currently unable or unwilling to quit. Sustained smoking reduction can be achieved and maintained with NRT. The corresponding reduction in exposure is associated with tangible health benefits, measured using surrogate markers. Smoking reduction also promotes abstinence in smokers who are unable or unwilling to quit smoking abruptly. NRT is well tolerated for smoking reduction, and nicotine intake does not increase during concomitant use of NRT and smoking.
由于吸烟相关疾病的高风险以及吸烟的高流行率,烟草使用导致了巨大的发病率和死亡率。现有的戒烟方法仅对有戒烟意愿且准备好戒烟的吸烟者有帮助,但绝大多数吸烟者处于未考虑戒烟阶段,他们既未准备好也不愿意尝试戒烟。这意味着当前治疗烟草依赖的策略无法充分满足很大一部分吸烟者的需求。由于香烟会过早导致50%的长期使用者死亡,任何可能降低死亡或疾病风险的额外措施都应予以认真考虑。现在,许多吸烟成瘾者在其大部分生活和工作环境中都被迫处于禁烟状态。大多数吸烟者对尼古丁上瘾,戒烟会导致烟草戒断反应和烟瘾,这些症状会在吸最后一支烟后的几小时内表现为临床症状。通过从香烟以外的来源提供尼古丁,如尼古丁替代疗法(NRT),可以控制烟瘾和戒断症状。短期戒烟的临床研究表明,所有NRT制剂都能缓解烟草戒断症状和烟瘾。大多数通过减少吸烟来降低健康风险的自主尝试都失败了,因为吸烟者会恢复到他们“通常”的尼古丁摄入量。然而,使用NRT来减少吸烟能让吸烟者在维持尼古丁剂量的同时减少香烟消费(以及烟雾中有毒物质的摄入量)。数据表明,使用NRT的吸烟者能够显著减轻因戒烟引起的戒断症状和烟瘾,从而减少每日吸烟量,并将这种减少维持长达两年。数据还表明,尽管存在一些补偿性吸烟行为,但使用NRT减少吸烟会降低毒素暴露。在减少吸烟的研究中,这转化为对健康有影响的变量的改善:心血管危险因素和血液流变学参数朝着更健康(即非吸烟者)的水平变化,肺功能也得到改善。已确定的心血管危险因素的改善提供了客观证据,证明减少暴露能带来临床上有意义的健康益处。此外,许多吸烟引起的疾病具有已知的可逆性、主要呈线性的剂量效应曲线以及没有任何阈值效应的迹象,这表明减少吸烟可能会带来更多的健康益处。更重要的是,减少吸烟可能会使吸烟者沿着行为模式朝着最终目标——戒烟迈进。在所有三项大型减少吸烟研究中,一些在基线时不愿意或无法戒烟的受试者在4个月、1年和2年时实现了戒烟,这清楚地支持了减少吸烟是迈向戒烟的一个步骤的概念。减少吸烟似乎并没有削弱戒烟的意愿,反而似乎增加了戒烟的动力。长期研究中逐渐上升的时点戒烟率反映了让吸烟者逐渐控制吸烟行为的重要性。在鼓励减少吸烟时,应明确强调完全戒烟仍然是最终目标,但处于未考虑戒烟阶段的吸烟者需要沿着行为模式前进,才会接受关于戒烟的信息。总之,本综述中提供的证据支持将减少吸烟作为一种合理的治疗方法,可供目前无法或不愿意戒烟的吸烟者采用。使用NRT可以实现并维持持续的吸烟减少。相应的暴露减少与使用替代指标衡量的切实健康益处相关。减少吸烟还能促使那些无法或不愿意突然戒烟的吸烟者戒烟。NRT用于减少吸烟时耐受性良好,在同时使用NRT和吸烟期间尼古丁摄入量不会增加。