Gosselin Robert C, King Jeffery H, Janatpour Kim A, Dager William E, Larkin Edward C, Owings John T
Department of Pathology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA 95817-2201, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Apr;38(4):563-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D245. Epub 2004 Feb 24.
Previous studies have indicated the variability of anti-Xa activity in different sources of heparin and the variability of different methods used for measuring anti-Xa activity. Manufacturers of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) determine each lot's anti-Xa activity against the World Health Organization standard, but little information is known about anti-Xa activity variation between lots of LMWH and the impact on reported anti-Xa activity in patient samples.
To determine the variation of plasma anti-Xa activity in patients receiving enoxaparin when different lots of enoxaparin are used for test calibration.
We obtained 7 lots of enoxaparin containing approximately 10,000 IU/mL and one lot containing approximately 15,000 IU/mL of anti-Xa activity. For each lot, a 2.0 anti-Xa IU/mL dilution was prepared and a calibration curve performed using a chromogenic method. To test the variation in reported results between the different calibration lots, 20 patient samples were tested. Nineteen patients receiving enoxaparin and one patient not receiving enoxaparin (negative control) were tested in a blinded fashion, and the changes in light absorbance recorded. Anti-Xa activity results from tested plasmas were then extrapolated from each enoxaparin lot calibration curve.
Using Student's paired t-test, there were statistically significant differences between the plasma anti-Xa activities generated from the various enoxaparin lots. In the range of 0.5-1.0 IU/mL of anti-Xa activity, 3 (4.2%) samples had a >0.2 IU/mL difference (maximum difference 0.33 IU/mL) in anti-Xa activity between 2 lots of enoxaparin. For samples that had supratherapeutic anti-Xa activities (1.0-1.5 IU/mL anti-Xa activity), there was a wider variation (>0.2 IU/mL) in anti-Xa activity, which may have resulted in a dosing change.
The statistical differences in plasma anti-Xa activities noted between enoxaparin lots are not clinically significant. However, anti-Xa activities in the upper therapeutic and supratherapeutic ranges (>1.0 IU/mL of anti-Xa activity) resulted in a deviation of >0.3 IU/mL in reported anti-Xa activity, which may result in dosing changes.
既往研究表明,不同来源肝素的抗Xa活性存在变异性,且用于测量抗Xa活性的不同方法也存在变异性。低分子肝素(LMWH)制造商根据世界卫生组织标准确定每批产品的抗Xa活性,但关于不同批次LMWH之间抗Xa活性的差异以及对患者样本中报告的抗Xa活性的影响,所知信息甚少。
确定使用不同批次依诺肝素进行检测校准时,接受依诺肝素治疗的患者血浆抗Xa活性的差异。
我们获取了7批抗Xa活性约为10,000 IU/mL的依诺肝素和1批抗Xa活性约为15,000 IU/mL的依诺肝素。对于每一批次,制备2.0抗Xa IU/mL的稀释液,并使用显色法绘制校准曲线。为了测试不同校准批次之间报告结果的差异,对20份患者样本进行了检测。以盲法对19名接受依诺肝素治疗的患者和1名未接受依诺肝素治疗的患者(阴性对照)进行检测,并记录吸光度的变化。然后从每条依诺肝素批次校准曲线推断测试血浆的抗Xa活性结果。
使用学生配对t检验,不同依诺肝素批次产生的血浆抗Xa活性之间存在统计学显著差异。在抗Xa活性为0.5 - 1.0 IU/mL的范围内,3份(4.2%)样本在两批依诺肝素之间的抗Xa活性差异>0.2 IU/mL(最大差异0.33 IU/mL)。对于抗Xa活性超治疗范围(1.0 - 1.5 IU/mL抗Xa活性)的样本,抗Xa活性的差异更大(>0.2 IU/mL),这可能导致了剂量变化。
依诺肝素批次之间血浆抗Xa活性的统计学差异在临床上不显著。然而,治疗上限和超治疗范围(抗Xa活性>1.0 IU/mL)的抗Xa活性导致报告的抗Xa活性偏差>0.3 IU/mL,这可能导致剂量变化。