Alam Hasan B, Stanton Kathleen, Koustova Elena, Burris David, Rich Norman, Rhee Peter
Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, USUHS, Room A-3021, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Resuscitation. 2004 Jan;60(1):91-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2003.08.006.
Activated neutrophils play a pivotal role in resuscitation injury. The strategies used for resuscitation (types of fluids and methods of administration) can affect the degree of neutrophil activation. The aim of this study was to test the commonly available resuscitation fluids in a large animal model of hemorrhagic shock to determine the strategy associated with the least degree of neutrophil activation.
Female swine (n=63, weight 45-60 kg) were anesthetized using isoflurane and catheters were placed for hemodynamic monitoring. After 120 min, they were subjected to a volume controlled hemorrhage (28 ml/kg) over 15 min, kept in shock for 60 min, and then resuscitated. The resuscitation groups were as follows: (1) anesthesia only (n=5); (2) hemorrhage, sham resuscitation (n=5); (3) LR-fast rate 3x blood loss (n=6); (4) LR slow rate-3x blood loss (n=6); (5) LR low volume-1x blood loss (n=6); (6) Dextran 40-1x blood loss (n=6); (7) 6% hetastarch-1x blood loss (n=6); (8) 5% albumin-1x blood loss (n=6); (9) 25% albumin-1/5x blood loss (n=6); (10) whole blood resuscitation-1x blood loss (n=6); (11) 7.5% hypertonic saline (HTS)-0.3x blood loss (n=5). Resuscitation fluids were infused over 1 h in all groups except group 4 (LR slow rate, which was over 3 h). Animals were observed for 180 min following the resuscitation period. Neutrophil oxidative burst activity was determined in whole blood using flow cytometery.
Animals resuscitated with dextran and hetastarch showed significantly (P<0.05) higher neutrophil burst activity. Resuscitation with LR also caused neutrophil activation (P<0.05), and the highest degree of activation was seen when a large volume of LR was given at a fast rate (group 8). However, all LR infusion protocols were associated with significant neutrophil activation compared with anesthesia (group 1) or sham resuscitation (group 2). No significant activation was seen in the animals resuscitated with albumin or fresh whole blood.
Artificial colloids and LR (independent of rate or volume of infusion) caused significant neutrophil activation, which was not seen with albumin and whole blood resuscitation. These findings suggest that the type of resuscitation fluid and method of infusion can influence neutrophil function.
活化的中性粒细胞在复苏损伤中起关键作用。用于复苏的策略(液体类型和给药方法)会影响中性粒细胞的活化程度。本研究的目的是在大型失血性休克动物模型中测试常用的复苏液体,以确定与最低程度中性粒细胞活化相关的策略。
使用异氟醚麻醉雌性猪(n = 63,体重45 - 60 kg),并放置导管进行血流动力学监测。120分钟后,在15分钟内对其进行容量控制出血(28 ml/kg),使其处于休克状态60分钟,然后进行复苏。复苏组如下:(1)仅麻醉(n = 5);(2)出血,假复苏(n = 5);(3)乳酸林格氏液 - 快速输注 - 3倍失血量(n = 6);(4)乳酸林格氏液 - 缓慢输注 - 3倍失血量(n = 6);(5)乳酸林格氏液 - 低容量 - 1倍失血量(n = 6);(6)右旋糖酐40 - 1倍失血量(n = 6);(7)6%羟乙基淀粉 - 1倍失血量(n = 6);(8)5%白蛋白 - 1倍失血量(n = 6);(9)25%白蛋白 - 1/5倍失血量(n = 6);(10)全血复苏 - 1倍失血量(n = 6);(11)7.5%高渗盐水(HTS) - 0.3倍失血量(n = 5)。除第4组(乳酸林格氏液 - 缓慢输注,超过3小时)外,所有组的复苏液体均在1小时内输注。复苏期后观察动物180分钟。使用流式细胞术测定全血中的中性粒细胞氧化爆发活性。
用右旋糖酐和羟乙基淀粉复苏的动物显示中性粒细胞爆发活性显著更高(P < 0.05)。用乳酸林格氏液复苏也会引起中性粒细胞活化(P < 0.05),当快速给予大量乳酸林格氏液时(第8组)活化程度最高。然而,与麻醉(第1组)或假复苏(第2组)相比,所有乳酸林格氏液输注方案均与显著的中性粒细胞活化相关。用白蛋白或新鲜全血复苏的动物未观察到显著活化。
人工胶体和乳酸林格氏液(与输注速率或容量无关)会引起显著的中性粒细胞活化,而白蛋白和全血复苏则未观察到这种情况。这些发现表明复苏液体的类型和输注方法会影响中性粒细胞功能。