Hyung Woo Jin, Cheong Jae Ho, Kim Junuk, Chen Jian, Choi Seung Ho, Noh Sung Hoon
Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Surg Oncol. 2004 Mar 15;85(4):181-5; discussion 186. doi: 10.1002/jso.20018.
Although various types of minimally invasive treatment have emerged as the best front-line therapies for early gastric cancer (EGC), there have been no established indications that these attempts are applicable. The purpose of this study was to propose indications for the application of minimally invasive therapy for EGC.
A total of 566 patients with EGC who had undergone gastrectomy with D2 or more extended lymphadenectomy, from July 1993 to December 1997 were retrospectively analyzed. The risk factors that determine lymph node metastasis were investigated by univariate and multivariate analysis.
The rate of lymph node metastasis was 11.8% for all EGC, 3.4% for mucosal cancer, and 21.0% for submucosal cancer. Lymph node metastasis was associated with submucosal invasion, larger tumor size, undifferentiated histology, and the presence of lymphatic or blood vessel invasion (LBVI) by univariate and multivariate analyses. When LBVI was absent, there was no lymph node metastasis if the tumor was smaller than 2.5 cm with differentiated histology, and smaller than 1.5 cm with undifferentiated histology, regardless of depth of invasion. Extra-perigastric lymph node metastases were noted in patients with submucosal tumors that have LBVI while none of mucosal cancer showed extra-perigastric lymph node metastases.
Minimally invasive treatment can be possibly applied for patients with EGC using these four independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis in EGC. For mucosal cancers, EMR is indicated for EGCs without lymph node involvement based on tumor size and histology. When we found LBVI by pathologic examination after EMR, gastrectomy with D1 lymph node dissection is mandatory. For submucosal cancers, patients with small tumors could be treated with laparoscopic wedge resection without lymph node dissection. However, patients with larger sized tumors or tumors with LBVI should be treated with extended (D2) lymph node dissection.
尽管各种类型的微创治疗已成为早期胃癌(EGC)的最佳一线治疗方法,但对于这些治疗方法的适用指征尚无定论。本研究的目的是提出EGC微创治疗的适用指征。
回顾性分析1993年7月至1997年12月期间共566例行D2或更广泛淋巴结清扫的胃切除术的EGC患者。通过单因素和多因素分析研究决定淋巴结转移的危险因素。
所有EGC患者的淋巴结转移率为11.8%,黏膜癌为3.4%,黏膜下癌为21.0%。单因素和多因素分析显示,淋巴结转移与黏膜下浸润、肿瘤较大、组织学未分化以及存在淋巴管或血管浸润(LBVI)有关。当不存在LBVI时,无论浸润深度如何,组织学分化型且肿瘤小于2.5 cm,或组织学未分化型且肿瘤小于1.5 cm的患者均无淋巴结转移。黏膜下肿瘤伴有LBVI的患者出现胃周外淋巴结转移,而黏膜癌均未出现胃周外淋巴结转移。
利用EGC中这四个独立的淋巴结转移危险因素,微创治疗可能适用于EGC患者。对于黏膜癌,根据肿瘤大小和组织学,EMR适用于无淋巴结受累的EGC。当EMR后病理检查发现LBVI时,必须行D1淋巴结清扫的胃切除术。对于黏膜下癌,小肿瘤患者可采用腹腔镜楔形切除术,无需进行淋巴结清扫。然而,肿瘤较大或伴有LBVI的患者应行扩大(D2)淋巴结清扫。