Cary Julie A, Madill Scott, Farnsworth Kelly, Hayna Justin T, Duoos Lisa, Fahning Mel L
Clinical and Population Sciences, University of Minnesota, 1365 Gortner Avenue 225 VTH, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55108, USA.
Can Vet J. 2004 Jan;45(1):35-41.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate 2 methods of semen collection that could be used as terminal procedures in stallions with irreparable conditions, such as fractures or colic. Electroejaculation was attempted under general anesthesia. Forty-eight hours later, the ponies were castrated and 2 different epididymal sperm collection techniques were attempted by using a flushing or floating method. Additionally, the effect of supplemental seminal plasma was evaluated. Experimentally, electroejaculation was found to be a safe but ineffective method of terminal semen collection. Viable sperm cells were successfully recovered with both types of epididymal collection. The flotation method was least cumbersome and showed a tendency to be superior to flushing in terms of sperm motility and percentage of cells passing through glass wool/sephadex filtration, although differences did not reach significance. The addition of seminal plasma to epididymal spermatozoa prior to cryopreservation was of no value. In conclusion, either method of epididymal sperm collection is an acceptable method of terminal semen collection.
本研究的目的是评估两种精液采集方法,这两种方法可用于患有无法修复病症(如骨折或绞痛)的种马的终末采精程序。在全身麻醉下尝试进行电刺激采精。48小时后,对小马进行去势,并尝试通过冲洗或漂浮法采用两种不同的附睾精子采集技术。此外,还评估了补充精浆的效果。实验发现,电刺激采精是一种安全但无效的终末采精方法。两种附睾采精方法均成功采集到了活的精子细胞。漂浮法操作最简便,在精子活力以及通过玻璃棉/葡聚糖过滤的细胞百分比方面有优于冲洗法的趋势,尽管差异未达到显著水平。在冷冻保存前向附睾精子中添加精浆没有作用。总之,附睾精子采集的任何一种方法都是可接受的终末采精方法。