Nelson Heidi D, Nygren Peggy, McInerney Yasmin, Klein Jonathan
Oregon Health & Science University and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon 97201, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Mar 2;140(5):387-96. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-5-200403020-00015.
Family and intimate partner violence is common in the United States and is often associated with acute and chronic health problems. Although the clinician's role in identification and intervention is considered a professional, ethical, and sometimes legal responsibility, the effectiveness of screening is uncertain.
To examine evidence on the benefits and harms of screening women and elderly adults in health care settings for family and intimate partner violence.
MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Health & Psychosocial Instruments, AARP Ageline, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, reference lists, and experts.
The authors selected English-language studies that included original data focusing on the performance of screening instruments (14 studies for women, 3 for elderly persons) and the effectiveness of interventions based in health care settings (2 studies for women, none for elderly persons).
Study design, patient samples and settings, methods of assessment or intervention, and outcome measures were extracted, and a set of criteria was applied to evaluate study quality.
No trials of the effectiveness of screening in a health care setting for reducing harm have been published. Several screening instruments have been developed; some have demonstrated fair to good internal consistency and some have been validated with longer instruments, but none have been evaluated against measurable violence or health outcomes. Few intervention studies have been conducted. Existing intervention studies focused on pregnant women, and study limitations restrict their interpretation.
Although the literature on family and intimate partner violence is extensive, few studies provide data on detection and management to guide clinicians.
家庭及亲密伴侣暴力在美国很常见,且常与急慢性健康问题相关。尽管临床医生在识别和干预方面的作用被视为一项专业、道德乃至有时是法律责任,但筛查的有效性尚不确定。
探讨在医疗保健机构中对女性及老年人进行家庭及亲密伴侣暴力筛查的益处和危害的证据。
医学索引数据库(MEDLINE)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycINFO)、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、健康与心理社会测量工具数据库、美国退休人员协会老年信息数据库(AARP Ageline)、考克兰对照试验注册库、参考文献列表以及专家。
作者选取了英文研究,这些研究包括聚焦筛查工具性能的原始数据(针对女性的研究14项,针对老年人的研究3项)以及基于医疗保健机构的干预措施的有效性(针对女性的研究2项,针对老年人的研究无)。
提取研究设计、患者样本及设置、评估或干预方法以及结局指标,并应用一套标准来评估研究质量。
尚无关于在医疗保健机构中进行筛查以减少危害的有效性的试验发表。已开发了几种筛查工具;一些工具显示出尚可至良好的内部一致性,一些工具已通过更长的工具进行了验证,但尚无工具针对可测量的暴力或健康结局进行评估。干预研究很少。现有的干预研究聚焦于孕妇,且研究局限性限制了对其结果的解读。
尽管关于家庭及亲密伴侣暴力的文献很多,但很少有研究提供有关检测和管理的数据以指导临床医生。